Technical Discussion
  >> Home Networking, Internet Connection Sharing, etc.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Ancient_Mariner
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 10-Jun-21 21:41:24
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
I should have said a VoIP phone.

The CW1308 cable installed is mainly 3-pair, but due a shortage at the wholesaler at the time, there is some 4-pair CW1308 (pity we didn't purchase CAT5 at the time frown

Cheers!

Clive

Andrews & Arnold Home::1 FTTC DrayTek Vigor 2762ac Cisco ATA191 and HUAWEI E5776 with O2 Data SIM
Standard User Ancient_Mariner
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 10-Jun-21 21:43:20
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: prlzx] [link to this post]
 
Yes, but all in use. Those adaptors are interesting though!

Cheers!

Clive

Andrews & Arnold Home::1 FTTC DrayTek Vigor 2762ac Cisco ATA191 and HUAWEI E5776 with O2 Data SIM
Standard User Pheasant
(fountain of knowledge) Thu 10-Jun-21 21:45:20
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: Ancient_Mariner] [link to this post]
 
10/100 is reasonably forgiving. It may just work on relatively short lengths of 1308. Much depends on the age/condition of the cable as well as the length. Totally against the standards, but in a pinch you don't lose much by trying.

Edit - you probably know this, but just in case, you need pairs 2 (orange and or/wh) and 3 (green and gr/wh) for 10/100. Not all 4 pairs at those speeds. These are the pair colours in a regular Cat X cable

Edited by Pheasant (Thu 10-Jun-21 21:50:55)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 10-Jun-21 22:01:09
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: Ancient_Mariner] [link to this post]
 
Could you convert to analogue at the easiest place and use the phone cabling for analogue phone extensions?

E.g if all the cabling went to the old BT master socket then just connect that cable to the VoIP adaptor or equivalent.

21 years of broadband connectivity since 1999 trial - Live BQM
Standard User Ancient_Mariner
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 10-Jun-21 22:15:02
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
That is also part of the "plan".

I want to see if my Cisco ATA191 can ring the existing phones (which are currently on a BT phone line), then that may well be the answer. Currently the ATA191 is happily ringing a desk phone upstairs plus line 2 on a Delta 700 two-line phone and a basic Panasonic cordless.

Cheers!

Clive

Andrews & Arnold Home::1 FTTC DrayTek Vigor 2762ac Cisco ATA191 and HUAWEI E5776 with O2 Data SIM
Standard User prlzx
(experienced) Thu 10-Jun-21 23:13:53
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: Ancient_Mariner] [link to this post]
 
I think I would go with DECT for the handsets with dual mode PSTN+SIP base unit, with the main base plugged into a switch or router without needing the CW1308 cabling.

UK DECT being sub-2GHz has a bit better range through walls than Wi-Fi especially with lower data rate requirements, and GAP providing vendor-agnostic compatibility.

I only mentioned the adaptors as those 10/100 looked relatively affordable (compared with gigiabit over coax or TP), and I don't know how much people pay for ATAs these days for comparison (are they usually second hand?).

I expect come the switchoff, ATAs will be what suits a minority but significant segment of the population wanting to use the same phone.
By analogy with the digital TV switchover, STBs were used to achieve the take up where people didn't want to replace all their TVs, and for people with VCRs or DVD recorders (commonly still connected over SCART even in 2009).

But I have a feeling most households will be using mobile (with or without Wi-Fi calling) in combination with ISPs offering a SIP package (as a line rental replacement) bundled into the fibre Internet monthly billing.

Enough people will want to keep the same geographical number at least for the first few years, even if it is automatically ported into their ISP such that they can also carry it with them on an app when out and about.



prlzx on Zen: FTTC (VDSL) at ~40Mbps / 10Mbps
with IP4/6 (no v6? - not true Internet)

Edited by prlzx (Thu 10-Jun-21 23:21:16)

Standard User Pheasant
(fountain of knowledge) Fri 11-Jun-21 07:02:34
Print Post

Re: CAT5 vs CW1308


[re: prlzx] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by prlzx:
Enough people will want to keep the same geographical number at least for the first few years, even if it is automatically ported into their ISP such that they can also carry it with them on an app when out and about.

That’s precisely what I’ve been doing for several weeks now. What’s now available, the next generation of SIP soft-phone apps, like Acrobits Groundwire, which is far and away a more clever and sophisticated solution than previous smartphone SIP apps; uses ios / android native push notification on inbound calls. The app doesn’t even need to be running at all on the smartphone, and it’s completely seamless on WiFi or the mobile network.

So I effectively have all my landline numbers (several SIP registrations) available and working wherever I have my smartphone, without needlessly sucking up battery, and it works seamlessly and brilliantly. Totally converted.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to