|
|
Created a new post, as the other one was losing focus.
I will post updates here:
Order has been placed.
Paid initial setup fee on credit card
This is a business package, so all prices are ex VAT.
Cerberus does have a AUP, but it DOES NOT state any limits. Just that they will warn you when they believe you are being excessive. I stated, my max download amount was 4TB in a given month, and was told that's fine, considering if you really hammered a 330mb line you could download 100TB, so 4TB is around 4% of possible total download.
Snake 
Edited by Snake (Fri 08-Sep-17 14:59:26)
|
|
|
|
I don't like the sound of AUP. They can change it whatever they like. They might say it ok for u to downloading 4TB no problem. But later on they might warned you do not excessive 750GB only time will tell. If they lied to u, can you get out of it? I doubt it.
|
|
|
All ISP's will have some sort of AUP. Please don't reply to this thread use the other thread. You are just making unwanted noise and causing confusion.
Snake 
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
|
This is a free forum to anyone to post or reply. There is nothing stopped me or prevent me of posting here. So u can't tell me what to do. Only MrSaffron can.
|
|
|
As much as you have a point, Max, I think for Snake to kindly ask you to use the other thread, isn't worth complaining over.
|
|
|
I'm not saying you can't post. All I said was that I wanted this thread to be about updates and not debates over what you or I think is right.
I don't work for Cerberus, and if your not happy with AUP or any other policy that's fine. No one is forcing you to sign up. I just want post updates about the install here. So please if you want to discuss more about policies, contracts etc... use the other thread, so people can get updates here without having to go through an entire thread.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Ok, good luck. I look forward to see updated post from your Cerberus FTTPoD installation and updated from Openreach survey.
|
|
|
Just a quick update for anyone following:
I have been out of the country and so haven't really been chasing Cerberus. However they did try to call me and leave messages. They also followed up via email to let me know they are waiting on Openreach to schedule and survey. Openreach seem to be very busy, but they hope to have a date soon.
Snake 
|
|
|
Update: 20/09/2017
Yesterday Cerberus informed me that Openreach will be doing an external survey to figure out how to get the Fibre service to my premises. Since their is no existing network (FTTP) in place. This should be done by the end of this week with an update provided on 25th of September.
The surveyor may ask to see the inside of the property, however the internal survey could be a separate survey depending on how much work they believe they have to externally. So in the event the external work is going to cost a lot they may just go back with an update stating excess charges and only do internal survey once they know the customer is going ahead and happy with the excess charges.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
If you already have ductwork in place to your property, then I would be surprised if there are ECCs involved.
You stated in the other thread that you're in Band B (200-399m from the agg node), so you should be well within the £1,350 threshold before ECCs come into play.
|
|
|
I be very surprise if Openreach survey gonna cost u a bomb bill of more than £2,000 to cancel the order. Your probably end up Band C or D instead of B.
Edited by adslmax (Wed 20-Sep-17 22:32:37)
|
|
|
I think that�s what they are going to confirm. The aggregation node is close, however duct work etc... needs to be confirmed. I have a pole right outside my house, so I am guessing that�s probably the path it will take.
Snake 
|
|
|
You don�t pay the £2400 (inc VAT) if the survey has excess charges.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
so u took first order from cerberus 8th September, openreach doing survey on the 25th September. Look like they speedy it up with your order to get FTTPoD activation date around December before xmas day!
|
|
|
The default time is 60/90 days to install, so yeah it could be December, but I was told this by them up front. They said the fastest they think it could be done is 60 days, but it all comes down to the survey.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Wish u all the best of luck. Remember post back each photos of the work by openreach, modem, router and post back speedtest (morning, afternoon and evening.
|
|
|
|
Same here, actively following as I'm tempted by Cerberus's FTTP on demand offer, I believe there's ducting under my house as there was a piece of string there ready for Openreach to install the cable when we moved in around 6 years ago, waiting to see how it goes on here before ordering myself.
|
|
|
|
How can you tell there is ducting there? I got a footpath label BT under it just a few step out of my house. Can Openreach installing there?
|
|
|
|
Because they can't pull cable through the ground with string. There must be ducting if they were pulling cables with string.
Sounds like a new property.
|
|
|
This the one footpath label BT just outside of my house. Please note: this is not a picture of mine, just example one
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/images/news/7389-open...
|
|
|
|
The duct comes out of the ground and the copper goes down it, it's a fairly new property.
|
|
|
|
Spoke to cerberus today myself, AUP / Fair usage policy doesn't have a cap, as in no GB / TB limits and their low prices is due to being the first to have a new deal with Openreach which also doesn't charge traffic usage unlike the older £300 deal, other companies may end up having the same lower priced deal later on. Can use your own router with their FTTP on demand as well.
|
|
|
Spoke to cerberus today myself, AUP / Fair usage policy doesn't have a cap, as in no GB / TB limits and their low prices is due to being the first to have a new deal with Openreach which also doesn't charge traffic usage unlike the older £300 deal, other companies may end up having the same lower priced deal later on. Can use your own router with their FTTP on demand as well.
This is complete nonsense.
Firstly, Openreach purely provides the connection from the end user's premises to the local handover exchange, there is no charge for data with Openreach.
Secondly, Openreach does not offer special 'deals' to new individual CPs. They are legally not allowed to do this as it would breach their equivalence covenant.
|
|
|
|
There seems to be a disconnect between the Sales team and underlying reality. I would guess they are using backhaul from some LLU operator rather than BT wholesale.
|
|
|
Can we keep this thread for updates of install only please
Happy for this discussion to continue on the other thread.
Snake 
|
|
|
I placed an order with Cerberus on 5 September. The latest update I have is that OR are waiting to schedule a surveyor to do the survey. The good news is that have processed my order.
I haven't been given a survey date yet. I live in London so I guess it will depend on the availability of surveyors in my area.
I am in Band E so they are going to have a long run of cable to install. I'm hoping there are no complications with getting fibre to the tel phone pole that is right by my driveway. I will then need to speak to them about how I get the fibre to my house either under my drive way or in the air like my copper line is currently.
I'll post my updates in this forum for you guys.
Edited by deleted (Thu 21-Sep-17 23:43:33)
|
|
|
|
lol
|
|
|
The latest update I have is that OR are waiting to schedule a surveyor to do the survey.
...snip...
I am in Band E so they are going to have a long run of cable
Not sure how this all works but how do you know you are in Band E if the survey hasn't yet been done?
|
|
|
|
Bands are based on distance to node. Standard pricing based on distance and then if there are "excess costs" (shown in the survey) then these would be in addition to the banded install costs.
|
|
|
|
As mentioned above when you place your order they calculate what band you are in from your phone number and the estimated distance your current line is from the node.
|
|
|
Update: 26th September 2017
Got a Openreach Surveyor, he will now be visiting my property tomorrow. I am guessing the external Survey was done, so now they just want to confirm any internal issues etc...
Will update after the surveyor leaves tomorrow.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Thats good. Thanks for updated
|
|
|
you are lucky. I am still waiting for any type of survey.
I'm beginning to think OR are giving you preferential treatment.
|
|
|
Lol I wish. I just called Cerberus yesterday to get update as they told me to call them on Monday, and today I got call from Openreach.
It might be because I am closer to aggregation point, but I don�t know. I will ask the surveyor tomorrow and see what he says.
Snake 
|
|
|
Update: 27/09/2017
So the Openreach Surveyor just left. All is good, except the pole outside my house will need to be replaced. The surveyor said that would not incur any excess charges as BT would be replacing it anyway. They will hopefully speed up the replacement as it is now required part of the installation. Might add a week or two to the install.
Snake 
|
|
|
Did you ask the surveyor how they choose the priority of their surveys in London?
I'm still waiting for my call from OR to schedule mine.
Great news though on your progress so far. I'm hoping I will be as lucky.
|
|
|
I did ask, he said there isn�t a pretence it�s just as surveyors become available. I would keep pestering Cerberus to make sure they are on Openreach to get someone out
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Did Openreach Surveyor tell u which band are u on?
|
|
|
Band B - same as everyone been saying. He did say my install should be super easy, barring the pole needing replacement.
Snake 
|
|
|
Do u think I am possibly in Band B not Band F? Because my property run copper wiring under the ground. Outside of my front garden footway there is a label of BT on it, probably aggregation node a further up by the cabinet.
Edited by adslmax (Wed 27-Sep-17 21:17:20)
|
|
|
I wouldn�t know, you might able to find out If you call Fluidone or Cerberus.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Your nearest aggregating node will serve a number of local cabinets. Chances are the Agg Node is further than the cabinet.
The fact you have a BT chamber on the footpath outside your house doesn't mean the Agg Node is any closer. It's just because your line runs underground, and chambers are dotted along the length of of your line.
Who told you that you were band F?
|
|
|
|
cerberus told me I am on band F
|
|
|
|
Then you're band F.
It wouldn't make good business sense to tell a potential customer their installation bill is going to be thousands of £ more than it should be.
|
|
|
That's why it put me off. I wait until g.fast come to my cabinet next summer.
|
|
|
|
Update 28 September:
Hi All,
I have an exciting update. A very nice and friendly OR surveyor called me this morning to let me know that he is scheduled to do a survey at my house tomorrow.
I have arranged to be at home to take him through all the details of where I want the line to enter my house etc.
I will let you all know how it goes and what issues etc. he raises.
At least I am beginning to feel some real momentum here. My install is probably going to be a lot more complex than Snake's as I am in Band E.
|
|
|
|
Sounds great, I hope the install process goes smoothly!
|
|
|
My install is probably going to be a lot more complex than Snake's as I am in Band E.
Not necessarily. Mine was band D (~ 800m to agg node) yet I had the service installed in just over 3 months without any dramas. If they run your fibre in u/g ducts all the way to agg node then potentially the biggest hurdle is blocked ducts which can cause delays, especially if the ducts need to be dug up to remove the blockages.
|
|
|
|
Yeah agreed.
I'm just worried that the longer the run of fibre needs to be the higher the chance that something gets physically in the way that can cause delays.
|
|
|
Well for me it seems the telephone/telegraph pole is the issue, I am assuming they will run the fibre at the same as the pole change then have a fibre manifold on the pole. After the engineer will do the final run to the house.
I am hoping I can get it all sorted by the end of October, although that might be pushing it, however I definitely think it should be all completed before the end of November
Snake 
|
|
|
It is highly unlikely that the pole erection team will be doing the manifold at the same time.
|
|
|
I was hoping the pole team and the fibre team with corordinate the work to reduce the disruption etc...
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Update 29 September:
Hi All,
So the OR surveyor arrived this morning 10 mins before our scheduled appointment. A really nice and friendly man.
Anyway he was more of an expert on the external running of the fibre but I showed him the internal location of where I want the fibre to terminate in my existing cupboard in the garage.
He said that he doesn't see any problems running the fibre to the side of my house and in through the external wall by my garage. They are basically going to run the fibre from the pole suspended in the air like my existing copper cable, and then run the fibre along my roof drains and pipes to hide it. I was worried that fibre can't bend etc but he said it's no problem for my run. So no digging up driveways or anything for me.
Also what's interesting is he said he'll recommend they replace my existing copper cable with a new dual cable that has both fibre and copper so that there is only one cable hanging above my driveway rather than 2.
As I mentioned he wasn't that knowledgeable on the internal equipment and internal socket.
I want to replace my existing FTTC openreach modem with the Fibre ONT one and also place the fibre socket next to the existing BT copper socket. However I don't know what the dimensions of the ONT and fibre socket are.
Do any of you know?
Also do you guys know if you can cancel your line rental for the existing copper line once you get the fibre line i.e. will BT treat them as one line?
Lastly I asked the surveyor what sort of times they are experiencing from survey to final installation and he said around 3 months.
Obviously that is dependant on physical issues like blocked ducts or needing to close roads etc. He told me he doesn't think there is any major issue with running the fibre to my tel pole but he would let me know if he discovers one.
Will keep you all updated.
|
|
|
Based on my measurements, dimensions of my 4 port ONT are 20cm x 15cm (length x height)
http://postimg.org/image/5iuymdvpx/
http://postimg.org/image/5wwalzfth/
The copper line remains totally independent of your FTTP line. I'm getting a second (backup) VOIP landline through Sipgate and test this out for a few months for reliability & voice quality. If its as good as my copper TalkTalk line then i will cancel the copper and go VOIP only for voice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for all the info guys.
baby_frogmella from your photos it doesn't look like you have a BBU. Did OR not mandate that you needed one?
It's nonsensical that they do because voice is being provided over the fibre but apparently in their rules they have to install a BBU. Maybe in practice they don't bother with a BBU for FTTPoD.
|
|
|
I've been reading the thread with interest.
Did fttp show on the dsl checker that it was available to you? Or did you decide to look around for a company that would bring fttp to your house?
Either way I'm glad your install is going well
Demon => Freeserve => Pipex => Be => Sky => BT Infinity 2
|
|
|
|
FVA is not supported with FoD at the moment.
The BBU comes with all FTTP/FoD installations, even though it only work with FVA in the event of a power outage.
|
|
|
Also do you guys know if you can cancel your line rental for the existing copper line once you get the fibre line i.e. will BT treat them as one line?
FoD is completely independent of an existing copper service, so you can get rid of your copper line and set up some form of VoIP if you wish.
|
|
|
|
Openreach bod did offer to install the BBU, however I politely declined as I wanted a tidier install. I didn�t see the point of getting it installed as I can�t use any FVA service for 3 years at least. However you may be (un)lucky and get the newer ONT which has a BBU built-in...it�s bigger though! The newer versions are due to installed from October onwards.
|
|
|
what is BBU?
Snake 
|
|
|
|
battery backup unit
|
|
|
Thanks
Snake 
|
|
|
|
This thread is about FTTP On Demand installation which shows up as 'available' to most people on the BT checker - provided they can already get a FTTC service. At present its just Cerberus and Fluidone selling the service, though another isp called Distant Voice will also be selling the service soon.
|
|
|
|
I hope I don't get this newer bigger ONT as I want it to fit neatly in my comms cabinet and just replace my current FTTC modem.
The engineer called me back just now saying he had finished his external survey and hadn't found any major issues.
I think I now need to wait until Tuesday for official confirmation that there are no extra construction charges so that I can proceed with the order.
|
|
|
The installer won�t/shouldn�t fit the ONTE in your comms cabinet, it should be wall mounted, keeping the fibre solid in its position.
From the ONTE it�s a standard ethernet cable to the router - so house that in your cabinet instead.
|
|
|
|
Thanks Zarjaz that's very useful information about it needing to be wall mounted.
My current FTTC modem is mounted to my cisco switch using very strong velcro but I assume that's not going to be good enough for the ONT.
|
|
|
|
Update 11 October 2017:
Hi All,
So I've had an exciting update today. OR have confirmed with Cerberus that there are no additional charges for my installation.
They have also provided Cerberus with an estimated delivery date of 14 November. If there are no issues then this date can be achieved and if it is I will be super impressed.
So now I just have to wait and hope there are no issues during the installation like blocked ducts etc.
If the 14 November date is achieved then the total turn around time will be 2 months and 9 days.
|
|
|
Good news there Mumba
I shall draw mystic tunes with my cleaver to assuage the fibre Gods for you
|
|
|
I am going to placed an order FTTPoD with Cerberus next week and give it a go. I know I am on Band F but maybe Openreach might surprise me after survey with no addition charge.
Hopefully I should get FTTPoD 330/30 before xmas day!
Edited by adslmax (Thu 12-Oct-17 16:10:21)
|
|
|
Update 13/10/2017
Just been told install date of 16th November. As long as there are no issues with pole replacement etc...
There are no ECC charges.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
total turn around time will be ? months and ? days?
|
|
|
2 months 8 days or so. Under the estimated 90 days, so I am impressed so far
Snake 
|
|
|
That's pretty great. Can't wait to placed an order on Monday with Cerberus.  Hopefully mine will be ready just in time before xmas day.
|
|
|
Very surprised your ordering after all the FUP and AUP discussion and also how you were treated before? Also if you really are Band F it�s going to be double / triple my installation cost upfront.
Snake 
|
|
|
Don't think it will be band f. Cerberus confident it won't be in band f. They told me don't worry about FUP or AUP. It's will be totally UNLIMITED USAGE under FTTPoD.
The estimated lead time to activation is 90 days for variable connection charge bands A-E. The estimated lead time for variable connection charge bands F-K is not defined.
Edited by adslmax (Sat 14-Oct-17 01:30:14)
|
|
|
|
My order had been placed and paid by set up fee on my credit card.
|
|
|
My order had been placed and paid by set up fee on my credit card.
Nice one, hope you get it installed without any dramas. Did you have to pay the setup fees (band F?) in advance?
|
|
|
|
Oh dear! Why oh why did you do that?
|
|
|
Well you finally bit the bullet - I hope you see it through to the end!
Question: Do you think 330Mb/s will be fast enough?
FTTP 80/20 Mbps
|
|
|
|
Snake it's going to be interesting to see who gets theirs first you or me.
Both our estimated dates are mid November. Also the estimated date is for the external connection they still need to co-ordinate another team for the internal connection which I am hoping will be scheduled the same day or the next.
Let's hope we both are up and running before the end of November.
|
|
|
My biggest concern is the pole replacement. Otherwise I�d think I would have had it sooner
I�ll be happy if I can get it on or close to that date. I am away on holiday and won�t be back until the end of the month so only two weeks to go when I get back
Snake 
|
|
|
|
I had a pole replacement on my order, that part went reasonably smoothly (2-3 weeks to sort out). What's really poleaxed me was the revelation that there's an FTTP card needed at the head end exchange which is a 6 month wait!
Fingers crossed you won't get any nasty surprises like that.
|
|
|
I don�t think I will, since I am very close to Ilford where thy have rolled out fibre etc... so they could borrow a card if needed. They also did do some work in ensuring they knew what was needed etc... but this could be all wishful thinking
Snake 
|
|
|
|
If you're in a more populated area, I think you're right it'll be ok from that perspective (I'm fairly rural, and have a feeling I'm the first FTTP order in the area).
That said it definitely wasn't picked up before the order was placed as I'd been given an expected completion date of Dec 2017 intially and a load of work (e.g. pole replacement) was done before the availability check on the head end was completed and suddenly shot my completion date out to sometime Q1 2018
|
|
|
|
Rasene please tell me you used the word "poleaxed" on purpose.
|
|
|
|
Well if i hadn't I'm definitely going to pretend I did!
|
|
|
Let's hope we both are up and running before the end of November.
Or let hope three of us are up and running before the end of November. I have to wait for Openreach to do survey on the 30th October. Already paid setup fee on credit card. Hope my band isn't F or G.
Cerberus gave me a special SMS service for hard of hearing who unable to hear engineer call when doing the survey as the engineer will text me instead of calling me. That's a good start. They put disability as top priority between the customer, isp and openreach during this stage phase.
Plusnet couldn't do this way!
Edited by adslmax (Tue 17-Oct-17 17:05:03)
|
|
|
Oh dear! Why oh why did you do that?
Because I want it. I got the money!
|
|
|
Well you finally bit the bullet - I hope you see it through to the end!
Question: Do you think 330Mb/s will be fast enough?
Well for now 330/30 is more than enough then after 36 months, might change to FTTP 500/50 if all possible.
|
|
|
Nice one, hope you get it installed without any dramas. Did you have to pay the setup fees (band F?) in advance?
Thanks, no I just pay the setup fee by CC. After survey done, if no further cost and will go ahead, but if it was extra cost of Band F or G then will let me know so I can decide to go ahead or not. And will refund the setup fee back to my CC if not go ahead. But Cerberus hope it won't be the case and believe I shouldn't be in Band F or G.
Edited by adslmax (Tue 17-Oct-17 17:13:46)
|
|
|
Will it affect my phone line or my current fibre with plusnet when survey come out?
Edited by adslmax (Tue 17-Oct-17 17:15:12)
|
|
|
Will it affect my phone line or my current fibre with plusnet when survey come out?
Nothing happens to your existing copper line and any voice/data services on it remain untouched.
|
|
|
|
Thanks, if FTTPoD go ahead then I will cancel it with Plusnet but I just wait until the service went LIVE first. Do u think I will get FTTPoD go live before xmas day as I know openreach is very busy during December before break up for holiday.
|
|
|
Who is your account/sales manager? Mine is Martin, he has been a top bloke, between him and the rest of the team at Cerberus I am very happy with the service provided
Snake 
|
|
|
Snap! Martin is my Sales manager and yes he is very helpful and was awareness of my disability too. Far miles better than Plusnet.
Edited by adslmax (Tue 17-Oct-17 17:42:18)
|
|
|
|
Can't wait for g.fast?
|
|
|
Oh great to hear.
Snake 
|
|
|
Can't wait for g.fast?
FTTPoD is far better than g.fast as g.fast is very limit depend how far away from the cabinet. I wouldn't get full 330/50 on g.fast. FTTPoD is guarantee 330/30 no matter how far away from the telephone exchange.
|
|
|
section 75 protection, sound move.
|
|
|
|
No such thing, it's business not consumer.
|
|
|
|
Throughput is not guaranteed. It's a shared service on the backhaul.
|
|
|
|
You will get G.fast before FoD - that much I can say.
|
|
|
Throughput is not guaranteed. It's a shared service on the backhaul.
True, FoD is contended but in the 4 months or so I�ve had the service I�ve not had any slowdowns. 310/30 Mbps throughput day & night
|
|
|
|
To clarify some information for readers of this thread - the only upfront charge that Cerberus makes is for the installation band a property resides in. This means:
We input your information and we retrieve your Variable Cost Band (VCB) immediately
We make you aware of the cost of that band immediately
We provide you with a formal quotation with the stated band and stated cost combined
Payment by the customer is then made on this basis before any engineer is sent to site
There is no separate installation cost to pay where we then send an engineer to find out what band a property is in. This is known upfront, made clear and is known by Openreach engineers attending site from the get-go.
I'm very happy to see some of our clients in here, and finding positive experiences all round - we appreciate the feedback on an independent forum.
|
|
|
You will get G.fast before FoD - that much I can say.
I heard my area won't be ready until next summer or autumn 2018. It won't be ready before xmas for my area. FTTPoD will be.
|
|
|
You will get G.fast before FoD - that much I can say.
I heard my area won't be ready until next summer or autumn 2018. It won't be ready before xmas for my area. FTTPoD will be.
Don't forget that G.Fast is an 'up to' service (rate adaptive) so you'll always be trying to squeeze every bit of juice from your line (assuming you don't sync at the max 330/50). You'll constantly be wondering
Am i connected to the right type/make of G-Fast Pod?
Am i using the right type of G.Fast modem?
and potentially worst of all: will the dreaded DLM ever remove my banding?
On FTTP no such worries. You'll get a brand spanking new fibre optic cable installed all the way from the agg node to your living room and your ONT will ALWAYS "sync" at the speed you're paying for. None of this 'up to' rubbish or DLM to worry about. Reboot your ONT as often as you like  Of course FTTP is not immune from congestion but this is potentially the only possible problem you're likely to face on FTTP wrt speed issues. Not that i've experienced any speed issues on FTTP (touch wood)
|
|
|
I agree as FTTP/FTTPoD are the future NOW! G.Fast is just like another upgrade from ADSLMAX (8Mbps) to ADSL2+ (21Mbps) and for VDSL to G.FAST (76Mbps to varies up to 330Mbps) but I knew g.fast will get 330 for approx 5% of it (must be within 50m or less)
FTTP or FTTPoD no worry at all. And goodbye to DLM.
Edited by adslmax (Wed 18-Oct-17 13:08:51)
|
|
|
|
To be honest if you are potentially in Band F for FTTPoD then G.Fast isn't going to do a lot for you in the current rollout no matter when it lands.
|
|
|
Why ?
FTTPoD bands are from the aggregation node to the property, nothing to do with the PCP.
|
|
|
|
Have either Cerberus or Fluidone offered to give you 330/50 when it is available? I thought this band was due to become available in October.... which is roughly now!
|
|
|
|
Hi Bill100
I haven't been offered 330/50. Where did you hear that FTTPoD was being offered at 330/50 from October?
|
|
|
Snap! Martin is my Sales manager and yes he is very helpful and was awareness of my disability too. Far miles better than Plusnet.
Mine is Vruti. She and her team are amazingly helpful and efficient at keeping me up to date with the progress of my order and my detailed questions.
They really do seem to care about customer service and realise how excited we early adopters are to unwrap our shiny new fibre lines as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
I guess it depends on where the agg node is in comparison to the cabinet. The cab could be a lot closer than the agg node but it could also be further away.
|
|
|
Update: 19/10/2017
BT engineers on my street rolling out the fiber to the pole  - I asked about the pole replacement, but they said they don't do that bit. The good news is that they have run the fiber up to my street corner without any issues. Last run from end of the street to my pole.
Here are some images:
https://gyazo.com/fa99d12a7617882291b94e5db1b7ed7c
https://gyazo.com/38340320216348dc052d794981080377
https://gyazo.com/0c862aa6ba992d6b1aee5e5d054f6992
Nothing to see really, but its all happening now
PS: Mumba - I am also working with Vruti she has been awesome. Martin was from sales, but still calls me to make sure things are going smoothly. Awesome service so far.
Snake 
|
|
|
Just for info - it�s �fibre�
Sounds like your service is edging nearer
|
|
|
I work with a lot of American companies so bad habit of fiber  yes uk english it's fibre
Snake 
|
|
|
So they told you that you are on band f. How much did they charge for installation
Snake 
|
|
|
They are up to the pole now
Just been told, Openreach looking to replace the pole asap, fingers crossed will have a date for that soon. I like the fact the fibre run be done and so the pole guys can do their work and the fibre will be in place already
https://gyazo.com/24c31cb6e392ae5f6b00a627f91969bf
Snake 
|
|
|
Bad news
The fibre reached 20 meters to the pole, but the duct work is blocked. So they have put in for duct work replacement  .
I am guessing this is independent from the pole and so just comes down to when that can be done.
Snake 
|
|
|
Bad news 
The fibre reached 20 meters to the pole, but the duct work is blocked. So they have put in for duct work replacement .
I am guessing this is independent from the pole and so just comes down to when that can be done.
Snake you are so lucky that you are seeing physical progress already. It's not cool that you have this blocked duct issue but still they are working on it at least.
OR have told Cerberus that for my job they need to allocate night workers as day work will delay things due to traffic management etc.
So now I am at the mercy of OR actually making night resources available for my job.
|
|
|
I honestly wasn't expecting anyone from OR today - I saw three vans and thought just maybe it might be them, but didn't want to get too excited. Then I got a call from Cerberus to confirm engineers onsite today and possibly tomorrow. However they managed to get very far, shame the last 20m or so had to be blocked
Oh well now I have to wait for someone to dig up the pavement and fix the blockage, also need to wait on pole replacement, then fibre run.
The good news is, I am still just under a month away from the install date, and I think they gave a date based on things like blocked ducts coming up. Don't want to be over confident, but maybe just maybe they will still hit that date.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Does that mean you�ll end up with ECCs?
|
|
|
Does that mean you�ll end up with ECCs?
OR are responsible for any issues with their own infrastructure like blocked ducts or poles.
Also once the survey has confirmed no ECC's I don't think they can add any afterwards.
|
|
|
Does that mean you�ll end up with ECCs?
I doubt it. Excess Construction Charges (ECCs), if applicable, are normally flagged up at the survey stage, if no ECCs apply then unforeseen work later on such as clearing blocked ducts shouldn't be charged for.
OP, I would take the estimated go live date with a pinch of salt - its not set in stone. Its just an estimate, mine was initially estimated to be in May 2017 but went live in early June. For me the most frustrating part was waiting for the FTTP line testing to be completed & for BT/OR dsl checker to update to 'native' FTTP - this took 3-4 weeks after the physical work was completed. But you'll get there in the end
|
|
|
No, these are covered by Openreach
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 20/10/2017
I got a card through the post today from Carillion. This contracted by Openreach to change the pole. The bad news is the proposed dates for doing the work
23/10/2017 to 23/03/2018 (5 Months). They do say in the card this is mainly because of planning permission, permits etc..
Ive let Cerberus know - lets see what happens.
Snake 
|
|
|
If your area is covered by Roadworks.org it will show up on there when a permit is issued, make sure you change the date option from the default which is today.You can even get it to send you an email.
|
|
|
ill keep an eye on the site, but I am away for a week so fingers crossed when I get back the OR elves would have changed the pole
Snake 
|
|
|
ill keep an eye on the site, but I am away for a week so fingers crossed when I get back the OR elves would have changed the pole 
I need the Elves to have night vision goggles in my case.
|
|
|
|
Sorry to hear the bad news. Hope it will get quickly resolved asap.
|
|
|
Should be ok - I am away on holiday and I got a call from Cerberus to confirm they are chasing Openreach to get a confirmed date for the Pole. Still hoping for a completed install for the 16th of November
Snake 
Edited by Snake (Wed 25-Oct-17 19:51:35)
|
|
|
Update: 26/10/2017
I went to roadworks.org to see if anything was there and noticed that two BT/OR permits have been approved
So my pole and the duct work will be happening between 30th Oct and 1st Nov  . Cerberus have also confirmed OR have confirmed that the works should be going ahead on this date, they are also trying to have everything now completed for the 14th of November.
So far excellent communication and progress considering the issues that have come up
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Have you had your survey done yet Max?
|
|
|
|
No, not yet. Will let you know when it all done. Expecting next week
|
|
|
Updated. Cerberus just emailed me say Openreach survey will be on Monday 9th November (morning slot) slightly delay.
Re-edited: Thursday (not Monday)
Edited by adslmax (Fri 27-Oct-17 13:21:50)
|
|
|
At least its been confirmed...just a week or two to wait
|
|
|
|
Does the survey come to my house or not? What are they doing on the day?
|
|
|
Does the survey come to my house or not? What are they doing on the day?
Yes, the OR Surveyor will come into your house briefly to determine the cable routing from the entry point to the ONT location - you can request the ONT to be installed whereever you want it. He will take some photos internally and then spend most of the time outside tracing the route back to the agg node. Offer him plenty of tea and biscuits
|
|
|
Cheers. I will get a tea or coffee plus a cake ready for OR Survey. Thanks. I would like to have it in the back garden rather than the front garden but my master socket coming from underground the pathway at the front garden at the front hallway. The fibre cabinet approx 243m away from my house.
Edited by adslmax (Fri 27-Oct-17 12:51:24)
|
|
|
|
9th November is a Thursday!
|
|
|
Yes and what about it? Oh sorry my mistake it actually Thursday not Monday. I have now re-edited.
Edited by adslmax (Fri 27-Oct-17 13:20:57)
|
|
|
|
You said Monday 9th Monday...
|
|
|
|
Yes I know. Got the day wrong! I have now changed to Thursday in my dairy book. Thanks for the warning.
|
|
|
Yes I know. Got the day wrong! I have now changed to Thursday in my dairy book. Thanks for the warning.
You're welcome mate, I'm in the process of changing my gas and electricity supplier so knew that either the day was wrong or the date was wrong. You don't want to miss that appointment!
|
|
|
|
I thought you lived in a flat Max?
|
|
|
Yes, the OR Surveyor will come into your house briefly to determine the cable routing from the entry point to the ONT location - you can request the ONT to be installed whereever you want it.
Thanks. I would like to have it in the back garden rather than the front garden but my master socket coming from underground the pathway at the front garden at the front hallway. The fibre cabinet approx 243m away from my house.
Back garden probably not an option for the ONT unless you mean in your shed.
Back of the house might be an option for the CSP though, depending on cable routing possibilities.
FTTP 80/20 Mbps
|
|
|
|
You thought it wrong. I always lived in a house with two gardens and a garage.
|
|
|
Likely to carry cost implications if that was ever to actually happen
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
Do you mean extra charge cost? If I want it in the back garden
|
|
|
At least its been confirmed...just a week or two to wait 
Cerberus Networks has not placed an order for this Forum user - adslmax.
We have not organised this survey, and we have not taken payment from this individual. The user has previously named his account manager earlier in this thread. That account manager is not dealing with this individual. It is also untrue that we have organised for a hard of hearing service, as kind as this report is.
As nice as some of these comments are, it would be disingenuous for us to watch this progress further without addressing it. Please disregard information from this user.
Comments from other users are correct, and we thank you for your feedback on your experiences so far.
|
|
|
|
I think this was fairly obvious, but thanks for confirming.
Max - time for another break from the forum I would think.
|
|
|
I taking a long break year off. Please accepted my full apology as I was so wrong in this of making things up. Apology to Cerberus, MrSaffron and forum members. I am illness. I taking a year off. No more posting for me.
Good luck to those on FTTPoD with cerberus. Wish them the best of luck.
Edited by adslmax (Fri 27-Oct-17 15:19:54)
|
|
|
|
Apology. I am so illness mental health problem and often jealous. I shouldn't make it up. A year break would do me good.
|
|
|
Oh my, how embarrassing. I must say I agree with Cerberus posting this as it could really damage their credibility in the long term. Max has made many many claims regarding his communication with them.
I think this was fairly obvious, but thanks for confirming.
Max - time for another break from the forum I would think.
I agree.
I taking a long break a year off. Bye! I highly recommend you do. If you are suffering from depression/other mental health related issues, I recommend visiting your local GP and discussing your problems. From experience I can say there are many great services out there.
Good luck with your break Max.
Edited by j0hn83 (Fri 27-Oct-17 15:26:11)
|
|
|
Thanks for posting this.
Hopefully this thread can now go back to normal.
I will be posting up pics as soon as I see the engineers on the road.
Snake 
|
|
|
Just goes to show how hideously overpriced lousy FTTPoD actually is, that the only way most people can really afford it and get it - is by dreaming about it.
Shame on Cerberus for not dealing with the whole issue via PM, surely a breach of data protection right there.
Edited by deleted (Fri 27-Oct-17 21:14:08)
|
|
|
|
Quite right for them to publicly state they are not dealing with any such order when someone has gone out of their way to lie, for whatever reason. No personal information has been given as they presumably don't have any, so no data protection issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you not see the post ......
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/t/4570381-re-...
Yeah seen it but Cerberus posted the above after I had asked Max. I genuinely believed he placed an order
Edited by deleted (Sat 28-Oct-17 08:23:10)
|
|
|
|
There is no data protectiuon issue, SO LONG AS thinkbroadband didn't supply personal and private information to cerberus linking the adslmax username to his real name/details - without his explicit permission.
|
|
|
|
Why would adslmax give TBB his real name/details?
|
|
|
No problem -
I believe the Cerberus rep did the right thing, doubtless Max�s fibs might have cast them in a poor light business-wise.
Good of Max to own up too.
|
|
|
Good of Max to own up too.
Did he jump or was he pushed? Clearly the latter.
I wonder how far he'd have continued with his fantasy?
FTTP 80/20 Mbps
|
|
|
Just to confirm, I told Cerberus up front when placing the order that I am snake from the TBB forum. I wanted them to know because, I would be posting on TBB everything that would be happening with my order. They were OK with me doing that.
Snake 
|
|
|
Just to confirm, I told Cerberus up front when placing the order that I am snake from the TBB forum. I wanted them to know because, I would be posting on TBB everything that would be happening with my order. They were OK with me doing that.
I don't think you should need to ask for permission when posting about a genuine service installation experience from any ISP. I certainly didn't ask FluidOne if I could post about my FTTPoD installation experience with them. In any case, its free publicity for the ISP so you're doing them a favour, not the other way around.
However if a poster starts telling stories about fictitious orders (as adslmax has done) then of course an ISP has every right to step in and refute these.
|
|
|
It wasn't about asking for permission, it was just notifying them as a courtesy. It wasn't hard for them to work out it was me anyway, based on my phone call's and the messages being posted who i was
Snake 
|
|
|
It wasn't about asking for permission, it was just notifying them as a courtesy. It wasn't hard for them to work out it was me anyway, based on my phone call's and the messages being posted who i was 
Well, that and the details in your profile
|
|
|
LOL
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 30 October 2017:
Hi All,
I've have another promising update. OR have informed Cerberus that they started their night cabling work on Thursday 26 October.
Cerberus are still waiting on more information from OR which they should get by Wednesday on how they are progressing with this work.
So at least some physical work seems to be taking place and my order is getting real momentum with OR.
I'll update you all shortly, with hopefully good news and not OR excuses about night resources or blocked ducts etc.
Do any of you have any tips of what signs of physical work I can go try and find on my street to assess progress? I know they are running the cable from a cabinet 1km away from my house so I will have to go hunt for it. Might be a great excuse to go for a run.
|
|
|
|
Why would OR give excuses about night resources or blocked ducts? It's in their interest to provide a service to you as soon as possible as they will only earn from your line when it's active and running.
|
|
|
Why would OR give excuses about night resources or blocked ducts? It's in their interest to provide a service to you as soon as possible as they will only earn from your line when it's active and running.
I didn't mean it in a way that implies that OR would do it on purpose just they are a big company and need to manage their night resources. Also about the ducts it's more a dig (excuse the pun) that I will be unlucky and there will be blocked ducts between my house and the cabinet /agg node.
On a serious note OR do seem to be providing as good a service as possible to lay the line as fast as possible. They just have a lot of logistics to deal with and old infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surely this a BIG BLOW for those who recently ordered with Cerberus and FluidOne with all these ridiculously overpriced from Openreach pricing. Feel sorry for them now.
Edited by adslmax (Tue 31-Oct-17 13:19:27)
|
|
|
I think you should edit that Max  . To make it clear the high price is due to Openreach charges, not either of the companies you cite.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. 200GB. Sync 73724/12601Kbps @ 600m. BQMs - IPv4 & IPv6
|
|
|
Done
|
|
|
|
Update 31 October 2017
Hi All,
I've had another update today from Cerberus. This time not the best news. So of course as my luck would have it OR have found blockages in their ducts during their work.
So now this means I am going to experience a delay but I have no idea how long. I should get an update in the next couple of days hopefully.
Regarding this new pricing it does feel like a kick in the teeth from OR to those of us that have orders in progress or recently had FttpOd installed.
They have been very vague with how the new installation costs will work but I assume it will be less than the installation costs on the current pricing.
Also it seems the monthly rental will be £60 less that they charge the ISP's. The most significant change seems to be that the contract only has to be 12 months. That's probably the biggest kick in the teeth.
|
|
|
They have been very vague with how the new installation costs will work but I assume it will be less than the installation costs on the current pricing.
For a single installation, no-one can say for certain until they've got new quotes and compared them to the old quotes.
The most significant change seems to be that the contract only has to be 12 months. That's probably the biggest kick in the teeth.
Agreed, though if we could predict the future I'm sure we'd all have 10 Gbps private leased lines funded by our lottery wins instead of FTTPoD
Edited by deleted (Tue 31-Oct-17 16:43:31)
|
|
|
Agreed predicting the future would be a handy skill.
Baby_Frogmella do you have any idea how long blocked ducts delay things normally?
|
|
|
|
Can be tomorrow, can be weeks.
It depends on where the blockage is, how big the blockage is, whether it requires external contractors to dig it out, whether council permission is needed and the general workload in the area.
For the most part, they are usually pretty fast at resolving blockages but it really depends on the work load in the area and the work required to resolve the blockage. New installations (liked leased circuits) or existing services with a SLA/SLG will take priority for local resources.
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure about Ceberus' terms, but I believe with OR that you would only be responsible for the work already carried out and the survey if you cancelled now. From the sounds of it, not much work seems to have taken place so far.
On the other hand, it's not clear what the new build costs would be for the new FTTPoD pricing. It's clearly geared towards getting a PON full of subscribers, so I would imagine that the costs would be lower than a single install now.
|
|
|
|
I wonder what type of criteria they use for premises passed per PON? Set radial distance from new PON perhaps?
|
|
|
|
Get well soon dude.
|
|
|
|
If I'm reading that correctly is that the first time Openreach have provided a 12 month contract time for FTTPoD instead of the 36 months it was on all previous orders?
I wonder, if that's the case, if it'll encourage more ISPs to start offering FTTPoD services...
|
|
|
|
The 12 month contract opens it up to the consumer market. However, a lot of ISPs don't resell the FTTP product itself so not sure if ISPs that don't sell FTTP would go into the FTTPoD market.
|
|
|
|
The change to minimum contract term could be very interesting as well as (AFAIK) once your FTTPoD minimum has expired it's possible to get a standard FTTP tarriff which is a lot cheaper. So more customers might pay for FTTPoD as a means of getting FTTP access...
I'm going to enquire with FluidOne about my existing order and whether this would affect it as it's currently blocked for an indefinite period of time waiting on a card at the head end exchange...
|
|
|
The change to minimum contract term could be very interesting as well as (AFAIK) once your FTTPoD minimum has expired it's possible to get a standard FTTP tarriff which is a lot cheaper.
My understanding is that the annual rental charges are the same for FTTPoD as native WBC FTTP under the new system.
ISPs may choose to charge more to the end user, but the costs from Openreach are the same.
|
|
|
Update 01/11/2017
The road works for the duct were finished yesterday, nothing exciting so no pictures sorry.
I got call today to confirm Pole should be replaced on the 9th of November.
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 06/11/2017
I was told that my pole change date has been brought forward. It will now happen tomorrow 7th November
I will try to make a time lapse video of it.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
I look forward to this video. Good luck!
|
|
|
Update: 07/11/2017
Telephone pole has been changed. Unfortunately my video of it is rubbish. I thought I rotated the video to capture the entire pole. The editing software decided to crop the top and bottom
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Update 9 Nov 2017:
Hi All,
I've had another update. It turns out that OR have completed their test rodding of the full 1km route to my house. Unfortunately it seems they have identified 18 blockages. Yes you read that right 18. It's probably the first time in 40 years that anyone has even looked at these ducts.
I am waiting on an update for an estimated time frame to clear these blockages and to get the fibre to the pole outside my house.
The good news is that separately the team that works on connecting the pole to my house and then running the fibre inside my house are scheduled to perform their work on 15 November.
So at least they are doing things in parallel and I will see some tangible evidence of work being done.
I did meet with some of the engineers from the pole to house team last Friday and they were very friendly and I showed them exactly where I would like the fibre to run.
So now I am at the mercy of the council and the efficiency of the OR contracting teams to manage to clear these blockages and get the fibre to my pole as fast as they can.
On an interesting note the OR engineer told me that the CSP can be fitted inside my house rather than outside which suits me as I have space in my comms cupboard for it. I thought the CSP had to be external.
@Snake it definitely feels like you are going to beat me to your first download on your new fibre line.
|
|
|
As long as you are home to provide access on the day they come to do the OH BFT and blow, then yes it can be indoors.
|
|
|
no worries mate, ill let you know as soon it goes live
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 10/11/2017
Fibre team is running fibre up the pole and terminating to a DP (I think that's what the block is)
https://gyazo.com/3cc658046c85aa9eb5b43cbb6ac99ac4
https://gyazo.com/a20682cdb7ccdc0e698de4186c9d4b44 (You can see new black box on the left hand side)
Snake 
|
|
|
|
I'm quite impressed how your order is progressing. If that is a new connector based fibre DP, will that mean your neighbours could now order standard FTTP?
|
|
|
My understanding is, that my neighbors would still have to pay the same installation charge. It would be a bit annoying for me to pay full whack for the street
Snake 
|
|
|
I'm quite impressed how your order is progressing. If that is a new connector based fibre DP, will that mean your neighbours could now order standard FTTP?
At present subsequent FTTPoD orders are charged at full price. However once Openereach's revised FTTPoD pricing kicks in from Feb 2018, one-off installation costs (single or multiple) will be based on actual work required instead of installation charge bands. So its possible that Snakes' immediate neighbours (and mine for that matter!) would pay significantly less in installation charges now that a FTTP splitter/DP has been installed very close by if they were to order the service next year. But under the new pricing, the neighbour(s) would need to request for a OR survey for which they would have to pay ~ £200 if they decided not to proceed.
Edited by deleted (Fri 10-Nov-17 10:12:48)
|
|
|
But under the new pricing, the neighbour(s) would need to request for a OR survey for which they would have to pay ~ £200 if they decided not to proceed.
Not forgetting though that an initial estimate would be provided free of charge. As far as I understand it.
|
|
|
But under the new pricing, the neighbour(s) would need to request for a OR survey for which they would have to pay ~ £200 if they decided not to proceed.
Not forgetting though that an initial estimate would be provided free of charge. As far as I understand it.
Are you sure about that? I thought under the new pricing OR would be getting rid of initial estimates (wrt installation costs) and would only give out installation costs after the survey. At present you're given an initial estimate (based on distance band) which is then confirmed or revised after the survey.
|
|
|
Are you sure about that? I thought under the new pricing OR would be getting rid of initial estimates (wrt installation costs) and would only give out installation costs after the survey. At present you're given an initial estimate (based on distance band) which is then confirmed or revised after the survey.
I think so, unless I read it wrong. Sounds like charge is only if the CP has agreed the initial estimate, proceeded to planning phase and then cancelled the order.
4) Prices are subject to survey and relevant FTTP on Demand Build charges. We will provide an initial, non-binding estimate of the level of build costs. Upon confirmation by the communications provider, we will proceed with a planning phase, and establish a final firm price for the build costs which is valid for a period of thirty (30) days. At this stage, if the communications provider does not want to proceed with the Order then it is liable to pay the survey and design fee.
Edited by deleted (Fri 10-Nov-17 10:30:13)
|
|
|
|
Thanks, so it appears under the new pricing you will still be able to get a free estimate of installation costs up front. Let's hope OR don't get snowed under with quotation requests from the Walter Mitty's of this world!
|
|
|
That would be annoying, but out of my control. For the pricing to change where the initial cost was paid by me  but I suppose its early adopter issue.
Snake 
|
|
|
I should add though, the chances of anyone on my street paying for fibre is 0%. unless it comes down £30 a month, no one on the street is interested in paying over that. I am a techie, work in IT industry (work remotely) so have different reasons.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
I would say you were a late adopter of a product most of us had been expecting to disappear in the near future. It is some time since BT started suggesting they were reviewing the old FTTPoD pricing model so I think most were waiting to see what they did.
|
|
|
Fair point, but still I signed up for what it was at the time (and currently is) - can't complain about the future
Snake 
|
|
|
|
This is probably a dumb question but I will ask it anyway.
If neighbours of us early adopters apply for fibre on demand do they then share the same physical cable that runs all the way to the cabinet or agg node that we paid money to install?
In other words will they use up our bandwidth or do OR run new lines to the telephone pole?
|
|
|
Fibre on Demand is no different to GEA-FTTP - the only differences have been ones to do with the price you pay
Under old FoD pricing it was priced so that you did not pay the full cost, and others ordering would still have to buy a FoD product with probably slightly less pricing than the first person.
Under new FoD pricing, an allowance is made for those the FoD order in theory makes, but anyone else ordering after the FoD customer is live gets access to the standard GEA-FTTP install pricing i.e. no FoD supplement needed.
In terms of bandwidth, go read on how GPON works i.e. 2.5 Gbps shared between a split of users, in the Openreach network that's 32 customers, some other GPON providers use the maximum of 128. Point to point fibre gives you dedicated bandwidth but at a slightly higher install cost and is what Gigaclear use currently.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
The CBT/DP on my polenhas 8 ports serve red by a single fibre. Since fibre can do 40GB depending on the connection point on each side, I�m guessing it�s the same fibre. Either way I can�t inagine our bandwidth getting split. That will happen from the exchange onwards
Snake 
|
|
|
Under new FoD pricing, an allowance is made for those the FoD order in theory makes, but anyone else ordering after the FoD customer is live gets access to the standard GEA-FTTP install pricing i.e. no FoD supplement needed.
I wonder if neighbours would automatically get GEA-FTTP option showing up or they would still have to order FoD without the upfront build cost?
|
|
|
Under the new system it would show up as GEA-FTTP for all those on the manifold(s) that have been connected up.
i.e. no need to find a FoD provider at all
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
The engineer told me that, they were suppose to put a four port cbt but they only had 8 ports so that's what they used. So I am not sure the checker would update to say you can get FTTP because it depends on how many ports are available. I still think it will be considered FTTPoD.
I guess an ISP could answer the question. The way I am reading your post, some people here might as well wait for someone on their street to order then order normal FTTP, wouldn't that just be insane?
Snake 
|
|
|
Despite the new u/g FTTP splitter not being very far from some properties on my street (IV2 5FJ), they still can only get FTTPoD, not 'native' FTTP as is the case for my home. The splitter is located in this BT manhole
https://goo.gl/ofmcQu
The BT/OR checker may one day show native FTTP availability for all the 15 odd houses on my street, but who knows if/when...
|
|
|
Normal setup is for Openreach to put in a 128 line splitter (4 trays, each one with a fibre back to the exchange and capable of serving 32 premises). They normally only have one tray live at a time and when that fills up, the next tray is prepared.
As Zarjaz deals with this stuff on a daily basis, I'm sure he can tell you what he sees now.
It's very likely that Openreach put in the infrastructure solely for you. The actual fibre cables are cheap, it's just the man hours that are the main cost factor. Even though you're the one footing the bill for building the network, it makes sense for Openreach to build the network for multiple premises.
Edited by deleted (Fri 10-Nov-17 16:43:43)
|
|
|
Is that splitter/manifold present due to you having ordered FoD?
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
Have exchanged emails with Openreach, and the question of what would happen like this is one I posed, and once I get chance will add to FAQ/news.
So if 1 person orders FoD and another 6 premises on same manifold/pon they subsequently be able to order native FTTP>
NOTE: This is not what happens today, but will happen once the new FoD pricing goes live. Remember with the new FoD system the montly price is the same as the native FTTP products.
So yes people could sit it out and wait for a neighbour to jump first, or you could just wait until Openreach do it commercially anyway, the question is how long do you want to wait.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
Is that splitter/manifold present due to you having ordered FoD?
Correct, it was installed as part of my FoD install (no native fttp in my area)
|
|
|
In which case that is to be expected as that is how the FoD system operates currently.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
So if 1 person orders FoD and another 6 premises on same manifold/pon they subsequently be able to order native FTTP>
Does this mean DSLChecker via BTw will show up native FTTP automatically?
|
|
|
The CBT/DP on my polenhas 8 ports serve red by a single fibre. Since fibre can do 40GB depending on the connection point on each side, I�m guessing it�s the same fibre. Either way I can�t inagine our bandwidth getting split. That will happen from the exchange onwards
Is this CBT/DP box a secondary splitter? Or "just" a connection DP?
Either way, your bandwidth is still likely to be split further ... at least when more circuits are installed.
|
|
|
Well the Openreach engineers told me, I�m the only person this fibre all the way to aggregation node. From there to the exchange it�s shared but still I�m reasonably postive that I won�t be hampered by contention ragioy
Snake 
|
|
|
When talking "shared" are you talking about users all sharing the bandwidth on a PON? Or where a strand of fibre happens to share the same physical space with other strands inside a cable?
It is highly unlikely, nay impossible, to start sharing the PON or bandwidth from the aggregation node up to the exchange... that's just the point at which the one strand of fibre from the splitter devices gets spliced into the fibre spine. Your PON's strand will be sharing cable with the strands serving other PONs.
All of your sharing of bandwidth happens within the splitter device - 32 strands of fibre at one side (to 32 individual properties) meeting 1 strand of fibre on the other side (to the exchange, through the fibre spine). This splitter device defines the PON, and is found somewhere between the AG node and your house.
The layout can be seen at this point in this Openreach video:
https://youtu.be/ouSB_3c_fm8?t=88
The 32 properties do not have to be on the same DP, or installed at the same time.
Yes, you are likely to be the only user connected to the splitter node at first, so getting the full bandwidth uncontended. But, in time, 31 others will join you.
|
|
|
That�s true in time more will join, but I�m sure that�s going to be a while
Snake 
|
|
|
Once the new system is in place yes
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
FWIW I'm getting ~ 310/30 Mbps day & night on FluidOne FTTPoD....for how long I'm going to be this lucky I've no idea  No reason why you can't as well provided there aren't any bandwidth issues at your exchange and Cerberus have plenty of capacity on their network.
|
|
|
I am sure I will hit the max possible also. The simple reason is, I am assuming from the aggregation node to the exchange the exchange there isn't a bandwidth limitation (i.e port bandwidth) if there is I am assuming its something high like 10gb or higher. Once at the exchange the port is most likely patched/routed to Cerberus network. Assuming they have purchase either a port or bandwidth quota which would be either 1gig or higher.
Cerberus isn't your run of the mill ISP so I don't expect there to be many people in my area with them.
Currently I am with Zen, and I get max speed of 65mb download and 17mb upload. I have never seen this go down during any time of the day.
Snake 
|
|
|
This will be really interesting, ill have my neighbor check in March and see if it indeed does and what prices they get quoted.
Snake 
|
|
|
If its GPON then its 2.5 Gbps shared 32 ways that you share potentially. If someone has stumped for a 500 or 1 Gbps product then XGPON with 10 Gbps shared will be the norm - hence its higher costs due to need for better optics at each end.
At the exchange handover node likely to be a 10 Gbps handover, but lots of older areas are on 1 Gbps - so was more of a bottleneck than the PON itself
Remember the aggregation is totally passive and is just a light prism splitter
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
Might want to have a word with the Government then, since they want millions and millions of full fibre rolled out, because apparently millions want it.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
Millions of people may want it The question is can they afford it? Or happy to pay the current prices.
In my comment, I stated 0% chance unless ithe rental was around £30 a month. Who would say no to more speed. I am sure eventually it will drop but we don�t know when.
People like myself don�t mind paying the extra money because we want it, whether we need it, is a different argument.
Also considering Fluidone has been offering fttpod for a while and then Cerberus came along with a lower price, rather then embrace the competition people were questioning it?
I think what would be good is to have a poll to ask user what they think a fair price is fttp/fttpod (install/rental)
Snake 
|
|
|
I am sure eventually it will drop but we don�t know when. From February according to the news articles. Could significantly change the rate of sign up - especially if BT retrospectively turn the infrastructure that has been installed for FTTPoD into FTTP for new customers.
|
|
|
Maybe, need to start looking for the CBT on the poles
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 15/11/2017
Since the fibre run to the pole and connecterized block terminal (CBT) being attached to the pole. There has not been any movement. Cerberus are tying to get a new completion date and understand what other steps are remaining.
My understanding is that the following is outstanding:
1) Jointing work, where fibre's need to be joined into a single long cable. Then the connection is tested from the CBT to the aggregation node
2) A fibre run from the CBT to the inside of my house - ONT setup etc..
3) Connection needs to be activated
Lets hope I can have it by end of next week.
Snake 
|
|
|
Then the connection is tested from the CBT to the aggregation node
The only real way to test a fibre is to put light down it ... so the test at the CBT (is that a BT name for it?) will be all the way back to the OLT - the GPON port back at the fibre head-end exchange will generate the light.
|
|
|
Ive seen the term CBT (Connectorised Block Terminal) used a few places so I am assuming so.
In terms of testing, I don't think they have to test it all they way back. I would make the assumption that from the aggregation node to the exchange is a working connection/fibre and so they would only need to test up to the aggregation node.
Still waiting on an update so once i have more information i will post an update hopefully with more official details
Snake 
|
|
|
The only real way to test a fibre is to put light down it ... so the test at the CBT (is that a BT name for it?) will be all the way back to the OLT - the GPON port back at the fibre head-end exchange will generate the light.
Agreed.
|
|
|
The way to test is to make a light loss reading ...... to do this you'll need to measure the loss of the whole shebang, as Wombat says.
|
|
|
Understood. Just need the guy with the shiny light to turn up
Snake 
|
|
|
Update: 15 November 2017
Hi All,
I have another update for my order. So I waited at home yesterday for OR to come and connect the fibre from the pole outside my house to my roof and then to run it into my house.
All was going well with the engineers arriving in the morning. However after about 40 mins they rang my door bell to tell me they could not do the installation that day.
I obviously asked why and it turns out the contracting team who have the hoist truck had bought the wrong type of clamps with them. They bought clamps that are used for normal copper cables and not fibre.
The OR engineer who seemed to know what he is doing said that because fibre is new the contractors don't always realise they need to bring specialised clamps.
So that was a very frustrating experience for me. It won't delay the final go live date because as mentioned before my main delay is being caused by the 18 blocked ducts that still have to be cleared.
My advice to anyone else who is having fibre run from their tel phone to the roof of their house is to remind OR to bring the right equipment for fibre.
|
|
|
Update 15/11/2017
Just been told cable shortage and need to wait till OR has the cables in stock
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Oh dear me. Unlucky. Sorry to hear this.
|
|
|
I would have said is there a reason the contractors cant go back and get the right clamps and then resume work? seems very odd.
|
|
|
|
I did ask but I they said they need to order the parts etc.
I was looking at roadworks.org now and I noticed there are roadworks logged by BT from 18 Nov to 22 Nov on the street where my cabinet is.
The description is:
"Install 86m of 1 way poly duct in Footway "
Do you guys think that it's possible that work is for all my 18 blocked ducts or just the few where the icon of the roadworks is showing on the road on the map?
86m sounds like a lot but my entire run is 1km so maybe it is only for a few of the 18 blocked ducts.
Anyway at least progress seems to be happening.
|
|
|
30 November 2017: Update
Hi All,
I have another update on my installation. So OR arrived this morning this time with the correct clamps to run the fibre from the pole and into my house.
Again all the OR engineers were extremely friendly. They discussed the overhead path they would like to take the fibre to and I showed them where the cable needed to enter my house.
A hole was drilled through my external wall and they pushed the fibre through and have now left a long coil of fibre inside my cupboard. Another team will connect that fibre to a CSP and then an ONT all inside my cupboard.
They couldn't give me any updates on my 18 blocked ducts and Cerberus haven't had any updates either about that.
At least now I have something physical to look at to remind me that I will eventually get my fibre line.
As an FYI the fibre cable they ran also has a copper cable which gives you the option of running a copper tel line service with the fibre over the same physical cable.
Also OR are very reluctant to drill holes through your walls if there is any risk of breaking pipes etc. I had arranged for an air conditioning company who are fixing my air con unit which is in the exact same cupboard to drill the hole for them. OR ran the fibre neatly against the air conditioning pipes on the external wall.
Lastly I asked them to cut an existing copper cable that runs to my roof from the pole that is not used and they very nicely did that for me too without any complaints.
Here is a photo of the fibre coil that has been left in my cupboard:
https://anonimag.es/image/JT9zMj1
I'll keep you guys updated.
Edited by deleted (Thu 30-Nov-17 12:29:22)
|
|
|
Update: 10/12/2017
Sorry guys I haven't had a chance to update. Openreach finally managed to get hold of the cables, and the jointing was completed over a week ago. However they Engineer was trained to climb the pole and so another engineer will need to come out and do that final check.
I was told last week, the final stage of the install and the test from the pole should happen soon (hoping this week 11/12)
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 12/12/2017
I just got a call from Openreach and now have a final install date of the 19th.
Something interesting that I noticed today was the BT wholesale checker now shows FTTP as available
https://gyazo.com/dd53afb0586da1b49c976cf973d4f9c0
What is more interesting is, if I check just using postcode and house number, my house always shows FTTP, but none of my neighbours come up as FTTP only FTTPoD. I am guessing that might change after February.
I used this checker: https://www.dslchecker.bt.com/adsl/ADSLChecker.Addre...
Snake 
Edited by Snake (Tue 12-Dec-17 11:39:35)
|
|
|
Hi Mumba,
Have you checked the bt wholesale checker or the ultrafast checker to see if your property is showing up as FTTP. Once all the fibre work is done this gets updated.
Snake 
|
|
|
Hi Snake,
My number and post code are still only showing FTTPoD. It sounds like you are very close to going live. I'm really happy for you and of course jealous.
Unfortunately my order is being held up by the 18 blocked ducts. It seems movement is happening on 5 of those blocked ducts only. I have no idea when my line will go live. If I had to guess I would say mid to end Feb but that is based on nothing but gut feel and some wishful thinking.
I'm at the mercy of my council to approve all the works BT need to do and for BT to have the resources scheduled to carry them out.
At least I have my coil of fibre to look at every now and again when I feel like being cheered up.
|
|
|
I could send you an Ezee bend lead in cable - you can be doubly happy then
|
|
|
Well I am just counting the days down. Let's hope it goes well on Tuesday. I will be taking pictures
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 19/12/2017
So today the Openreach engineer arrived and completed the entire fibre setup. All lights are green and I am now waiting on BT to confirm to Cerberus all is good and activate the last part.
Luckily I still have Zen internet for another week so I can still use the net. Just need to wait to connect to the new fibre. At least all the physical work is done.
Snake 
|
|
|
Update 19/12/2017
So today the Openreach engineer arrived and completed the entire fibre setup. All lights are green and I am now waiting on BT to confirm to Cerberus all is good and activate the last part.
Luckily I still have Zen internet for another week so I can still use the net. Just need to wait to connect to the new fibre. At least all the physical work is done.
Excellent news, almost there
Btw did Openreach install the 4 port Huawei ONT or the newer single port version with a BBU built-in? I believe the newer units were introduced in Oct but haven't heard of any case(s) where people had them installed.
Also I take it there was no external CSP installed as you have a connectorized set-up?
Edited by deleted (Tue 19-Dec-17 17:24:40)
|
|
|
Its the new one, all built in, he did give me the option, because the newer one is bigger.
Snake 
|
|
|
he did give me the option,
Naughty lad, all new installs to have the new single port ONT from last Monday, the old four port ones held as van stock to be used as replacements if an existing four port is found faulty.
I've not had my hands on one yet, but believe the 'bigness' is just a casing containing the two separate components ?
|
|
|
Congrats .... you got there.
|
|
|
It was because I said it was a bit big, I thought of it as good customer service
You are correct, it is just the casing
Snake 
|
|
|
still not live though
Snake 
|
|
|
still not live though
Some quirk with Cerberus maybe .... the very few I have fitted have been for BTB and have worked on the day of the install.
|
|
|
Well the install did finish around 4ish, so end of the day, still no joy with it
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Is the green PON light flashing? This may suggest OR haven't activated the ONT yet in which case another Engineer visit will be required to activate it. The OR bod just scans the ONT barcode with his smartphone and seconds later the PON light turns a solid green.
|
|
|
It is solid green. Been like that for a while
Snake 
|
|
|
It is solid green. Been like that for a while
Ah ok, that suggests the hold up is at Cerberus' end, hopefully won't be long.
|
|
|
So the issue is that on Cerberus system it is still showing as provisioning, I am guessing that BT handover so late in the day was just dropped some where along the line
Will have to wait till tomorrow most likely
Snake 
|
|
|
all new installs to have the new single port ONT from last Monday, the old four port ones held as van stock to be used as replacements if an existing four port is found faulty.
I wonder if we'll now see eBay flooded with the 4 port ONTs for sale, ie Openreach surplus stock a la HG612's
Might put in a cheeky offer for this, to keep as a backup - in case mine fails and OR don't have any spare 4 port versions anymore
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Huawei-Echolife-HG8420-BT...
Edited by deleted (Tue 19-Dec-17 19:24:47)
|
|
|
No good as a straight like for like swap ... you�d need OR to input the new serial number onto the system......
but if you had it in your cupboard, the engineer who came to fix the fault could sort that.
|
|
|
|
Hi Baby_frogmella,
Did you ever get your Netgear sorted? I am guessing you already down graded it to just a router.
Cheers David
|
|
|
Update 20/12/2017
BT have acknowledged that the line isn't showing up closed (work completed by OR). They have chased that so eventually all online tools will say the line is up and running and Cerberus and BT can do their final diagnostics before handing over
just a waiting game now
Snake 
|
|
|
Might put in a cheeky offer for this, to keep as a backup - in case mine fails and OR don't have any spare 4 port versions anymore
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Huawei-Echolife-HG8420-BT...
As with VM cable modems Openreach may refuse to activate kit they haven't directly supplied. As it's Openreach kit might be fine but buyer beware. ONTs require provisioning, VDSL modems don't.
|
|
|
Might put in a cheeky offer for this, to keep as a backup - in case mine fails and OR don't have any spare 4 port versions anymore
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Huawei-Echolife-HG8420-BT...
As with VM cable modems Openreach may refuse to activate kit they haven't directly supplied. As it's Openreach kit might be fine but buyer beware. ONTs require provisioning, VDSL modems don't.
Sorry, I wasn't clear: I meant I would buy it to keep it as spare and then get it activated by Openreach which I imagine they would do on the spot as its a genuine BT/OR ONT hence the serial no. would already be in their database. This was in case OR did not have a like for like replacement - which could easily happen say 5+ years down the line. Anway its a moot point now as that ONT has been bought by someone else....though the seller did reject my piddly offer of £5 LOL
|
|
|
update 20/12/2017
I just went live a little while back. Initial speed tests are hitting about 260MB download and 30mb upload.
although thinkbroadband speed test is only hitting 200mb etc..
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/_assets/speedtest/but...
This is from speedtest.net
http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6897358177.png
Snake 
|
|
|
|
congrats on going live Snake.
Why are you not getting the full 330? Are Cerberus still tweaking settings etc or is there a "learning" period that needs to happen over a few days?
|
|
|
Well officially when I contacted Cerberus they were still waiting on BT but they saw that I was able to logon. So maybe there is still some stuff that needs to be done.
The other thing could be that the router can�t handle the connection, but very unlikely as I�m using a HP N40L microserver running PFsense.
Lastly the speed test were done in the evening so could just be congestion?
Snake 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I think I have peaked download at 32.4MB (324Mb) a sec. I never expected it to hit 330MB you have to expect some over head. However I am happy with the speed and the service Cerberus have provided.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
Whats cpu usage like on a speedtest?
|
|
|
on the PFsense server 10/15% max. I double checked yesterday just to make sure it wasn't the server but after today's test I can confirm it isn't.
Snake 
|
|
|
Yeah, I think I have peaked download at 32.4MB (324Mb) a sec. I never expected it to hit 330MB you have to expect some over head. However I am happy with the speed and the service Cerberus have provided. There are 8 bits to a byte, not 10. So either it is 32.4MB/259.2Mb or 40.5MB/324Mb.
|
|
|
Yep that is correct, but when you get speeds from a tool like fro client etc.... they have taken into account the bit/byte conversion etc...
Some will even show you 320Mb / 3.2MB - either way the speed test shows over 300, not really going to cause a stir about a few meg.
Snake 
|
|
|
|
They can't take it into account. 320Mb is not equal (any where near) to 32MB (assuming you got the decimal point in the wrong place). The 2 are not synonymous. As long as you are measuring in Mb/s and it is giving a decent speed then that is fine but the MB speed you originally stated is nowhere near 324Mb - the conversion was just plain wrong.
|
|
|
Yeah my bad I rechecked - it does hit 321mbit
Snake 
|
|
|
that's awesome. I am really jealous now.
Come on OR fix my 18 blocked ducts already.....
|
|
|
That's a lot of blocked ducts.
Tim
www.uno.net.uk & freenetname
Asus DSL-N55U and ZyXEL VMG1312-B10A Bridge on 80/20 Meg Fibre
Speed Test
Current Sync: 79993/19661
BQM
|
|
|
More likely your local council holding up the works
Snake 
|
|
|
Yeah my bad I rechecked - it does hit 321mbit
So it's slower than VM who give me 383mbps all the time. (now anyway)
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/27296086.png
And a lot more expensive!
|
|
|
I didn�t even know VM did a 400MB service.
I couldn�t go with Virgin media simply because of the static IP issues.
Snake 
|
|
|
I didn�t even know VM did a 400MB service.
I couldn�t go with Virgin media simply because of the static IP issues.
Neither did I and if they did it would be displayed as 400Mbit not 400MB 
400MB is 3.2Gbit.
Paul
|
|
|
He's paying for a business line can't be compared to you're residential VM connection which at any point could run into congestion issue's  Also he could now order WBC FTTP at his address now should he need a 2nd line and in First quarter next year will offer 1 Gbit.
Unfair really as his SLA and guarantees will be much more robust than you're residential VM.
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I finally pulled the trigger on with Cerberus after a lot of research.
Hopefully it will be good. I'm at Band B so hopefully installation will not be an issue.
Decided not to wait for the pricing change, as it could potentially end up more expensive for installation and I have waited long enough.
Its a waiting game now but hopefully all goes well.
|
|
|
Welcome to the gang. Feel free to ask me any questions.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
Welcome to the club Ruscky,
I'm still waiting for my installation to complete because OR are taking their time to fix the 18 blocked ducts.
You'll probably be live before me.
I hope for your sake, Snake's and mine that you are correct that the new pricing will not be better for the 3 of us.
Good luck with your survey and hopefully your install goes smoothly without having to deal with OR infrastructure that is 40 years old.
@Snake do you have any updates on the stability of your line, speeds at peak hours, and latency?
|
|
|
Hey Mumba,
Basically what I have seen as follows.
Wifi can suck hard!! I have a Unifi setup and until i forced everything to 5Ghz, my iphone etc.. were rarely going over 120Mb, then once I changed that I can see they can hit 200/250 no problem using the speedtest app.
When testing against wired connection, I can easily get over 240/280Mb, I would say 80% of the day. to get over 300/315 it has to be either during the day, or late in the evening.
Note: The kids aren't at home during those hours and telling them and the wife to stop stream so I can do my test's just get's ignored
I can say though when no one is around at home, you can easily get to the 300Mb, now whether it can be pushed to 330Mb is hard to say because of overheads etc.. plus I think I need to upgrade my PFSense box, which I will be doing in the next few months (As soon as PFsense fully supports the atom C3000).
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the welcome appreciate it.
I don't think the pricing will change all that much, what might happen though is due to shorter term contracts the demand could go up making setup times much much longer. Also I don't think alot of ISPs know what their strategy on pricing will be as the new laws only coming in Feb so it might be well into next Oct before ISP have anything to offer customers.
Sanke do you have your own router or did you request one from them? I'm not sure what setup to go for yet. I currently have Zen along with their FritZ box. I'm considering getting a decent new router.
It seems like you're getting decent speeds, hopefully I can get something close to 330mb but living in Scotland not holing my breath for low ping and constant high speeds.
Mumba I cant wait to get it all installed but the servery is still a couple weeks away I'm guessing. I spoke to a very nice guy called Martin he was very helpful so far so will see how it all develops but hoping for a smooth experience like Snake had. I have read the entire thread before taking the plunge including the fluid one thread.
If you guys have any advice on router/networking setups that would be great. My current setup is a FritZ box feeding a 1Gbps 12slot Netgear switch and I also have google wifi feeding of the router.
|
|
|
I don't think the pricing will change all that much, what might happen though is due to shorter term contracts the demand could go up making setup times much much longer. Also I don't think alot of ISPs know what their strategy on pricing will be as the new laws only coming in Feb so it might be well into next Oct before ISP have anything to offer customers.
I believe under the new pricing structure the overall cost of ownership will remain the same, which points to increased installation costs in order to compensate for the lower monthly service charges and shorter minimum term. Unless someone has a crystal bowl no one can say for certain the take up numbers under the new pricing scheme.
living in Scotland not holing my breath for low ping and constant high speeds.
I live in Inverness and whilst I will never get pings in the single digits due to the laws of physics, I'm getting ~ 310/29 Mbps on Fluidone FTTPoD in speedtests day & night. Don't think I've seen the speed drop below 300 Mbps in the 6 months or so I've had the service. Obviously you'll be on a different ISP (network) but don't be surprised if you're hitting > 300 Mbps day & night.
A speedtest just now:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6941759976
If you guys have any advice on router/networking setups that would be great. My current setup is a FritZ box feeding a 1Gbps 12slot Netgear switch and I also have google wifi feeding of the router.
I have the Netgear R9000 (X10) and its brilliant. I'm also using it as a Plex Server and route OpenVPN traffic over it (using Kong's DD-WRT firmware) which makes the investment less eye watering. If you're not bothered about its advanced features then I would recommend the Netgear R7800 or Synology RT2600AC for significantly less money as they have very similar performance to the X10 wrt routing & wifi performance.
|
|
|
I have the Netgear R9000 (X10) and its brilliant. I'm also using it as a Plex Server and route OpenVPN traffic over it (using Kong's DD-WRT firmware) which makes the investment less eye watering. If you're not bothered about its advanced features then I would recommend the Netgear R7800 or Synology RT2600AC for significantly less money as they have very similar performance to the X10 wrt routing & wifi performance.
Given that the OP has Google Wifi I suspect that an all-in-one router isn't what they're after. In fact I've never understood the market for devices such as the R9000 (how much!) as you'd be far better off with a decent router and then access points as required to get good wifi coverage. Much cheaper and better performance - An integrated device is always going to be a compromise no matter how much you spend on it...
I'd wait and see how the Fritzbox/Google Wifi setup performs and then see what, if anything, needs changing.
Edited by ferretuk (Sat 06-Jan-18 20:46:41)
|
|
|
|
I live in Dunfermline so don't think my ping will be that much lower then.
Do you mind me asking why you went with FluidOne and not Cerberus, I know it wont make any difference to me since I've already signed up with Cerberus but just curious, their pricing differences are very interesting.
I will have a look at that Netgear looks interesting, budget not really a concern as long as its the right one. I'm thinking of adding a separate Synology DS918+ NAS box as well
|
|
|
If you guys have any advice on router/networking setups that would be great. My current setup is a FritZ box feeding a 1Gbps 12slot Netgear switch and I also have google wifi feeding of the router.
If your Fritzbox is lacking when you get up and running, look at the Ubiquiti range of routers or Microtik Routerboards for very versatile and cost effective routing. For Wifi, stick with separate units - If your Google Wifi doesn't cut it, look at other access points instead.
I don't have FTTP(oD) so can't vouch for throughput but my ER-Lite router and Unifi AC-Lite WAP perform very well.
AAISP Home::1 Terabyte | IPv4 BQM | IPv6 BQM | AAISP VOIP | ER-Lite Router | Unifi AC-Lite Wifi AP
|
|
|
access points as required to get good wifi coverage. Much cheaper and better performance -
I would argue getting a router with excellent wifi coverage could minimize or remove the need to buy additional wifi points. Google wifi can cost up to 229 notes (hardly cheap) whilst a Netgear R7800 which is designed for large homes, is 150 notes or less.
|
|
|
Do you mind me asking why you went with FluidOne and not Cerberus, I know it wont make any difference to me since I've already signed up with Cerberus but just curious, their pricing differences are very interesting.
When I placed my order with FluidOne in Feb 2017, they were the only isp at the time offering the service. AFAIK Cerberus started offering FoD around July 2017. I was originally interested in a leased line from FluidOne but they managed to ''convince'' Openreach to enable my exchange for FoD. My FoD line performs as well as a leased line wrt speeds but obviously it doesn't come with the same SLAs or speed guarantees.
|
|
|
I got a a mini HP N40L microserver running PFSense. I would always recommend PFsense over anything else. Just get the hardware you want (MiniITX etc..)
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
I would recommend the Unifi access points over anything else.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
Also on Virgin, same IP i've had for 11 months, and £38 a month for 380ish Mb down and 21Mb up.
BT really are playing catch up... I feel Virgin are gearing up to keep raise the bar again.
Edited by BuckleZ (Mon 08-Jan-18 13:28:05)
|
|
|
|
Hi I'm new on here, so apologies for the thread hijack.
I'm in a rural area with FTTC which was more than adequate but this has dropped to little better than ADSL in the last couple of months (4.5 down .4 up). I think this could be down to the state of the copper from cabinet to pole or pole to house.
Therefore I'm looking at both FluidOne and Cerberus - they were suggested by my account handler at Zen as Zen do not offer FTTPod.
But what has crossed my mind is I believe that all our cabling is still above ground, so although FTTPod is available to me, how does that work in practical terms?
|
|
|
Fibre can and is provided overhead too.
|
|
|
But what has crossed my mind is I believe that all our cabling is still above ground, so although FTTPod is available to me, how does that work in practical terms?
I can give some info.on that as I'm in a similar setup (all overground cabling for me). Openreach ran fibre to me via overhead poles from the aggregegation node to my house. It basically comes in to the property just like an ordinary analog line.
The only difference is that you get some hardware on the poles for the fibre joints.
|
|
|
|
I'd second that, I do like the Unifi access points. I ended up replacing the security gateway though.
Went with an HP microserver running Linux and did iptables rules myself. I wanted to run ntop-ng which I really like for network monitoring and that seemed easiest on vanilla linux. All seems to be working ok so far.
|
|
|
You should just use pfsense it just sooooo goood.
Usg is getting there (I test it every, now and then)
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Hi Snake,
Thanks for all the detailed updates on your speeds.
I've been checking roadworks.org tonight and it seems that BT have added a whole bunch of new work items which means progress is being made. The latest one has an end date of 23 Jan. I'm not sure if any other roadwork items still have to be submitted by BT
What's interesting though, and I'm hoping some of you guys might be able to provide some insights, is that it looks like BT are connecting me to a cabinet that is much further away from my house.
The dslchecker has always indicated to me that my line is connected to cabinet 16 which is around 650m away from my house but the roadworks are showing work is being done from cabinet 13 which makes the total distance about 1km. I am being charged for a 1km band but why couldn't OR just connect me to the closer cabinet and save me costs?
Also if the dslchecker shows cabinet 16 doesn't that mean I am connected to 16 currently or can that checker be wrong?
Also just as an FYI my fibre is being run underground until the pole by my house and then it goes overhead like a normal tel cable so as mentioned above fibre can easily be run overhead and underground. OR have already run the overhead fibre into my house and have left a long fibre coil hanging in my comms cupboard.
|
|
|
They don�t connect you to your cabinet, they connect you to your nearest aggregation node.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
That'll be where the fibre aggregation node is, they usually link multiple fibre cabinets. The costs are based on the distance to the node, not the cabinet.
|
|
|
|
Of course that makes a lot of sense. I assumed the aggregation node was always close to the cabinet but clearly it can be hundreds of meters away.
Thanks for clarifying guys.
|
|
|
Having the same IP because the DHCP lease hasn't expired and having a dedicated static IP are two different things. Virgin has a special mechanism to provide static IP addresses via GRE tunnel. This has caused all sorts of problems for people relying on a static address.
Sure can I go with a non static IP and just keep updating the DNS records via Dynamic DNS, but thats not all there is to it. You get a business service for the SLA and service.
Never really heard anyone say anything good about Virgin, but i am guessing it depends on the area etc....
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Hi Mumba,
With FTTP you don't connect to a cabinet you connect via the nearest Aggregation node which by the sounds of it is by cabinet 13.
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I have another question I'm hoping you guys know the answer to.
Why do OR restrict the upstream bandwidth so much on their fibre lines? Why don't they have symmetrical speeds for downloading and uploading?
Is it a technology limitation or is it simply a commercial decision?
Does upload bandwidth cost more somehow?
It seems the rest of the world offer symmetrical speeds with their fibre to the home products.
|
|
|
Not a technical thing I believe.
As for why, it was always explained to me that the majority of internet use, for residential customers at least, was a small �request� for data and what was requested being a larger download ....
Look at the speeds Virgin offer, small uploads again.
I guess if you want symmetrical you are still looking at �niche� stuff, private wires, etc = more cost.
Then again, the likes of Gigaclear offer symmetrical services, I wonder what their take up is like ?
|
|
|
|
Both technical and commercial. Opebreach use GPON to provide FTTP which has 2.5Gbps downstream 1.2Gbps upstream shared by every connection on that PON.
They also want to differentiate it from their symmetrical leased line products
|
|
|
|
Mumba have Openreach made any progress wrt clearing the 18 or so blocked ducts? I think its around 5-6 months since you placed the order, I would have thought your FoD service wouldn't be too far away from going live, if not already up and running.
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Sorry I haven't been posting updates. The reason is that I haven't had much to report. OR have been working on all my blocked ducts. They seem to have made some good progress but there are still some blocked ducts and issues. One of the hold ups is that they are having to erect a new pole to transport the fibre along the route to my house because the duct is going to be too difficult to unblock. I did see them working outside my house during the crazy Beast from the East weather.
I haven't been given a completion date yet because of the complexity of all the work.
If I had to guess I would guess that they maybe finished will all the ducts and poles in a months time but that is pure speculation by me.
OR must be cursing the day they accepted my order as it must be costing them a crazy amount of money for all this work but it is a result of their shoddy infrastructure. If I had ordered under this new pricing structure I wonder if they would have taken into account the extreme work they would have to do.
Anyway, I'll update you guys once I get some more concrete updates.
|
|
|
|
Update - 9 April 2018
Hi All,
I have an update today. OR have started work this morning on my final blockage. So 17 down 1 more to go. I saw them working on it with my own eyes this morning when I drove past.
They were digging up the road and pavement with a bulldozer and had a temporary traffic light in place. My neighborhood must be loving me at this point, good thing they have no idea who the works are for.
Anyway the works are scheduled to be completed by end of day Wednesday.
I might even receive an estimated date of completion for my project by the end of this week almost 7 months after placing the order.
I'll let you guys know how the next phase of jointing and laying the fibre goes and then the actual phase of internally connecting me up to the network. As mentioned before the internal fibre is already dangling in my comms cupboard and is connected to the telephone pole outside my house.
I think though that finally after 7 months I can now say that I am within touching distance of the finishing line. It still could take some time to lay the cables through the new ducts but at least it's going to be far less complex than 18 blocked ducts.
|
|
|
|
Update - 12 April 2018
Hi All,
A quick update. OR have now confirmed that all work on the 18 blocked ducts is now complete.
They are moving onto the next phase of running the cables. They haven't given an estimated completion date yet. Hopefully they will once they allocate resources to the cabling an jointing.
|
|
|
|
Update 4 May 2018
Hi All,
Believe it or not my order has only now just moved to the next phase of jointing.
It turns out that not all the civils to unblock the ducts were successful and OR had to find an alternative solution to one of the blocked ducts. Their solution was to run the cable overhead which it seems they have done now.
So assuming they really have now solved all the blocked duct issues they will be moving onto the jointing phase and hopefully give me an estimated completion date soon.
I seem to be involved in the never ending story of OR old and failing infrastructure.
Will post more updates when I have them.
|
|
|
The final hurdle mate
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Just thought I'd add something for the interest of everyone! We are in the final stages of getting our Fibre installed under the old pricing. Cerberus quoted us the £165pm for 3 years and £4,250.00 install costs under the old pricing which we have proceeded with. No excess construction charges after the survey etc. Ordered in October 2017.
Whilst most of the work has been done, BT have had to do a lot more work than anticipated and our install is taking longer because of this. They're having to install 154m of ducting in a carriageway and based upon their published costs (for a consumer) this would cost £19k. Therefore, you can see why BT have changed their pricing for everyone else as they must have been vastly under quoting the installation costs!
|
|
|
|
I would have bitten the hand off OR for that price! 154M of ducting works I can imagine would cost a fair bit. I was quoted £15,400+VAT for mine and it would be coming up new ducting already installed and is 13 yrs old max and not blocked. Bonkers price. If it was on or about your price or more I would have went for it! I just can not understand the price at all.
|
|
|
|
Yeah my install is taking way longer than OR would ever have anticipated. They have erected a new pole and had to unblock 18 blockages. I'm sure my install price would have been multiples more under the new pricing.
I think I calculated by true install costs are around £8k over the 3 year contract and my house is around 1km away from the node.
I'm sure OR are incurring far greater costs than £8k getting this fibre to my house.
|
|
|
I was quoted £15,400+VAT for mine
Was that a desk survey-based quote though?
|
|
|
|
Yes it was.
|
|
|
|
We have been very lucky with cost, being circa £10,600 over 3 years all in. We're in the middle of the country side in North Devon although luckily for us a node is reasonably close (2.5kmish) and I recall we were band E.
The council have been a pain with our install... requiring 3 months notice for road closures even on rural country lanes with minimal traffic. Cables have been run over water and tree cutting etc has been needed.
I'd love to be able to ask Openreach how much they've actually spent in connecting us..!
|
|
|
Update 31 May 2018
Hi All,
So OR have finally confirmed that the cabling phase has been completed and that the jointing phase has started. They have not given an estimated completion date yet.
I do feel that I am getting close to the end of this mammoth project.
Currently the project is at month 9 since ordering at the beginning of September 2017.
Edited by deleted (Thu 31-May-18 13:11:21)
|
|
|
For those curious, I have openreach coming around tomorrow to do the site survey.
I was speaking to them on the phone and I now know where the aggregation node is. I can say if this is of any help t anyone. It is literally about 3 to 5 meters away from the cabinet.
And most importantly you can see it as there are two ground manhole covers with BT on them.
This is what it looks like in the ground if I have not described it well enough.
https://ibb.co/bFhBQy
So maybe in urban areas have a look for two manholes with BT written on the cover near a cabinet to find your Aggregation node.
|
|
|
|
The trouble with that is that most cabinets have double/treble manhole covers in front of/very close to them.
An Aggregation Node usually serves 3 or 4 cabinets.
If you walk around your local area and check the 4 nearest cabinets it's very plausible that none of them have an Agg Node next to them.
Not only do we not know which cabinet our Agg Node is next to, we don't know what 3 or 4 cabinets share an A.N.
Without confirmation from OpenReach, an ISP, or just someone with access to the local network topology, there's really no way to tell where a particular AN is situated.
All the chamber counting in the world won't change that.
|
|
|
For those curious, I have openreach coming around tomorrow to do the site survey.
I was speaking to them on the phone and I now know where the aggregation node is. I can say if this is of any help t anyone. It is literally about 3 to 5 meters away from the cabinet.
And most importantly you can see it as there are two ground manhole covers with BT on them.
This is what it looks like in the ground if I have not described it well enough.
https://ibb.co/bFhBQy
So maybe in urban areas have a look for two manholes with BT written on the cover near a cabinet to find your Aggregation node.
Highly unlikely that your nearest agg node is right next to your FTTC cab. Btw i also have the same BT manhole next to my cab as well and in my case that certainly ain't no agg node.
You're better off speaking to the Openreach Surveyor who will clarify the fibre topology in your area.
|
|
|
The JF6 you describe could be hiding all manner of Openreach equipment, copper, fibre, nodes, cables, copper joints, etc, etc....
So spotting one is 100% NOT a sign of an aggregation node.
Even when open, these nodes look like some splitter nodes.
|
|
|
Damn.. *takes off my deerstalker hat and puts down my pipe lol
I wish OR would make the node map available. How come they don't? is it for commercial reasons or something else?
Demon => Freeserve => Pipex => Be => Sky => BT Infinity 2
|
|
|
For those curious, I have openreach coming around tomorrow to do the site survey.
I was speaking to them on the phone and I now know where the aggregation node is. I can say if this is of any help t anyone. It is literally about 3 to 5 meters away from the cabinet.
And most importantly you can see it as there are two ground manhole covers with BT on them.
This is what it looks like in the ground if I have not described it well enough.
https://ibb.co/bFhBQy
So maybe in urban areas have a look for two manholes with BT written on the cover near a cabinet to find your Aggregation node.
Highly unlikely that your nearest agg node is right next to your FTTC cab. Btw i also have the same BT manhole next to my cab as well and in my case that certainly ain't no agg node.
You're better off speaking to the Openreach Surveyor who will clarify the fibre topology in your area.
My Agg Node is 5 metres from where the cabinet stands . Most likely because it was the first cabinet installed.
|
|
|
There�s pretty much always a largish joint box adjacent to a cabinet, (known colloquially as the �cab hole�) it is carrying all the copper E and D side cables up in short ducts into the PCP itself.
There is often many large copper joints in there too ... little room for a large fibre node.
|
|
|
Damn.. *takes off my deerstalker hat and puts down my pipe lol
I wish OR would make the node map available. How come they don't? is it for commercial reasons or something else?
Probably for security reasons.
|
|
|
|
Update 6 June 2018
Hi All,
Believe it or not OR have now confirmed today that they have completed all the cabling and jointing work. Yay!!
Now they need to do the final commissioning work which involves connecting the ONT to the fibre dangling inside my comms cupboard.
Cerberus have already supplied me with the necessary settings for my router.
So now I wait for OR to give me a date of when they will need access to my house to perform this final work. I will then change the details in my router and hopefully start receiving lots of light down my 1km cable.
I'll update you guys once I am up and running and hopefully be able to supply some impressive line speeds and latency.
|
|
|
|
Update 8 June 2018
Hi All,
I have finally received my commission and hopefully completion date. OR phoned me today to tell me they will becoming to commission my line next Friday morning.
So my long 9 month saga is almost complete. Hopefully 1 week left to go.
|
|
|
 you have some serious patience, by this point I would have been going nuts!
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Not quite the same I know but it took considerably longer for our community funded All-In-One cab to be installed to serve our 75+ EO lines. I signed the contract late March 2015 and we went live in September 2016. Admittedly much of the delay being due to Lambeth rather than Openreach, our cab was stood in December 2015 but Lambeth wouldn't allow a duct to be dug across the road even though it was Lambeth who insisted the cab should be placed there rather than on the same side of the road as our development.
|
|
|
Glad to hear you're almost there, luckily I got mine installed in just under 4 months but I've heard stories of Openreach taking nearly 2 years for some FoD installs. This was 2-3 years ago though.
At present they are probably testing your FTTP circuit to make sure all is well, eg measuring loss of light at certain points of the PON to ensure its well within the specified tolerances. Once the testing is complete, a circuit ID will be issued for your line and the BT/OR DSL Checker will show "WBC FTTP" for your address (possibly 1000/220 Mbps  ), this should happen very soon and that's when you should get excited.
Good luck!
Edited by deleted (Sun 10-Jun-18 09:59:35)
|
|
|
|
HI baby_frogmella,
The dsl checker is showing that WBC FTTP is available on my number at 330 / 50 with a waiting list as the availability date.
What does this mean? Before FTTP on demand was showing now this and FTTP on demand are showing.
OR are scheduled for Friday morning to come commission the line.
|
|
|
HI baby_frogmella,
The dsl checker is showing that WBC FTTP is available on my number at 330 / 50 with a waiting list as the availability date.
What does this mean? Before FTTP on demand was showing now this and FTTP on demand are showing.
OR are scheduled for Friday morning to come commission the line.
Can you post a screenshot from the DSL checker? 'WBC FTTP' may update to 'available' once your line is fully commissioned.
|
|
|
Same thing my one says. Its generally the checker see's your line as FTTP once everything is run to the house.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
Same thing my one says. Its generally the checker see's your line as FTTP once everything is run to the house.
Snake does yours now say available for FTTP?
|
|
|
Can you post a screenshot from the DSL checker? 'WBC FTTP' may update to 'available' once your line is fully commissioned.
Here is a screenshot:
https://imgur.com/a/ZWc2S6T
|
|
|
Mumba
This is mine after my FoD install, yours should look similar. However you might see WBC FTTP 330/50 instead of 1000/220 as not all exchanges support the higher speed tiers. Not that there is any ISP selling the half gig and one gig BT Wholesale services just yet!
https://postimg.cc/image/bq3uo2z23/
|
|
|
Can you post a screenshot from the DSL checker? 'WBC FTTP' may update to 'available' once your line is fully commissioned.
Here is a screenshot:
https://imgur.com/a/ZWc2S6T
Ok it seems there's still some work left before WBC FTTP shows as 'available' on the OR checker, but you're close. Give it a week or two and FTTPoD should also drop off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nice.
You obviously don't get the 50 up right as they still have you connected as FTTPoD?
|
|
|
unfortunately no i dont  . I have been asking every other month, when I can get 1gig and 200 up  and still waiting
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
we always want more.
|
|
|
Update 15 June 2018
Hi All,
Well believe it or not I am finally live with my fibre. YAY!!!
It only took about 9 months and 10 days from ordering to completion.
Yesterday two very friendly OR engineers arrived to perform the final commissioning of the fibre inside my house.
They were pleasantly surprised to find that the fibre was already inside my house and that they didn't need to run it from the outside. I explained that was done months ago and they were very surprised. Must be some good internal comms in OR.
Anyway they spent about 1hr mounting the ONT and stripping the fibre cable down to the actual fibre (which I didn't realise was so thin) so that they could add the connector.
It actually took them 3 goes to get the connector working well but they think it may have been a faulty tester of the quality of the line rather than the connector.
They connected the fibre directly to the ONT. No CSP or any other joint box etc
They tested the line and showed me I had 14db which they said is good.
We then wasted a bit of time testing the line with their bt router with them not realising I was getting my fibre through Cerberus and not BT. As a tip to others make sure they are aware of this as they assume you are a BT customer.
I couldn't get my routers to work (tried 2 different ones) and I called Cerberus who were very quick to help.
At first their was confusion why the line was not working but it ended up being a simple case of the order needing to change from in progress to complete on both OR and BT's systems.
I let the OR engineers leave as they assured me everything was physically good with the line.
It took 2 hrs for the order to change to complete and my router immediately managed to connect to the cerberus systems.
By the way I am using a brand new Unifi USG gateway / router.
So now on to the speed results:
My initial speed test was disappointing. I was only getting 100mb but over 30mb upload.
I checked my router and realised it was syncing with the ONT at 100mb rather than 1gb over Ethernet.
This stumped me for a bit and after some googling I decided to change the Ethernet cable. Intermediately my router synced at 1gb to the ONT.
So I ran tests again.
My first run I got 332 / 32 about. I was very excited. However about 5 mins later my line dropped. It came back up and I retested.
This time I constantly got just over 300 / 30. Around 308 / 32.
I think the ONT re synced at a slower speed to the OR network after it first dropped to get more stability.
So far it has been stable since and I was expecting 300 and not 330 anyway.
My ping times seem really good at 3ms on speedtest.net.
I have discovered a potential issue though that I wanted to check with you guys if it is an issue.
If I upload a file and then simultaneously download my download speeds more than halve. The download speed drops to around 120mb.
I thought one of the advantages of fibre was that the upload and download channels don't interfere with each other like dsl does.
Is my thinking wrong and is this expected behaviour with fibre?
I'll try post some photos later of the ONT as it seems to be a new one with the batteries built into it. They are irrelevant as I am not getting voice with the fibre but it seems Ofcom mandate that the ONT has battery backup for emergency calls no matter if you have voice or not..
P.S. Dslchecker now shows 330/50 fttp as being available. I assume that change took place as soon as my order changed to complete.
Edited by deleted (Sat 16-Jun-18 09:25:27)
|
|
|
Glad it�s in at last, yaay.
It�s not �sync� as such, so that�s not �profiling� causing that�s first drop you.
No CSP as that�s a connectorised service that�s fitted. I�m sure the three attempts at fitting the end on the fibre were a trainee trying to do it (there were two turned up, one buddying up the other)
|
|
|
yeah I had a trainee and experienced engineer too but it was the experienced one doing the connecting.
Edited by deleted (Sat 16-Jun-18 09:30:08)
|
|
|
First of all congratulations! [groan...sorry]
Wrt actual throughput, your should be getting ~ 310/30 Mbps in speedtests, rest is taken up in overheads.
If I upload a file and then simultaneously download my download speeds more than halve. The download speed drops to around 120mb.
Seems normal. My download comes down to ~ 200 Mbps from 310 Mbps when uploading a large file. Whether this is down to the router or the actual fibre, I've no idea.
it seems Ofcom mandate that the ONT has battery backup for emergency calls no matter if you have voice or not..
I politely refused a BBU unit (for a neat install) when getting the previous gen ONT installed. The Engineer was happy to oblige, though not sure if he broke any "rules" regardless of the fact that I don't have any FVA service installed....cough cough cough
Edited by deleted (Sat 16-Jun-18 10:50:54)
|
|
|
Ah OK, they can be somewhat of a fiddle to put on.
Surprised the experienced bod was trying to put a BT router on it ??
|
|
|
Openreach can, on remote testing, see if there is or isn�t a BBU connected.
|
|
|
Openreach can, on remote testing, see if there is or isn�t a BBU connected.
Oh dear
|
|
|
Keep an eye out for the Openreach Detector Vans
|
|
|
Removed my BBU almost a year ago without any complaint, although I assume that if you had problems then it would show up during any diagnostics.
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/t/4558043-ont...
Pipex
Nildram
UKFSN
Be *
Xilo / Uno
Now -> Zen and BT
Fibre is here ! FTTP 
|
|
|
|
The BBU doesn't look bad as it's part of one unit now. It actually managed to fit perfectly in the space I had reserved for it.
Regarding the download speeds when uploading I was speaking to a friend of mine who is a network engineer and he said it's expected because when you download your device still needs to send a confirmation packet back to the server you are downloading from.
Therefore if the upload stream is being maxed out these confirmation packets will take longer to get back to the server and therefore slow down the download.
I'm just not sure if it should be as dramatic as what I am seeing. The way the router handles things probably does make a little bit of a difference. I was uploading to you tube for my test.
I must admit downloading a gig in 27seconds is really cool. It's definitely been worth the wait. So far my line seems very stable too at 310 mbs.
All I have left to do now is get my replacement cat5e cable from amazon and then tidy up my comms cupboard and screw things back into place to cover wires etc.
|
|
|
Try enabling QoS so that you don't absolutely max out your upload.
Set it about 95% of your upstream throughput and test it again.
You should really be able to download/upload at near maximum levels on FTTP.
I thought one of the advantages of fibre was that the upload and download channels don't interfere with each other like dsl does.
That's not how dsl works either. The downstream/Upstream bands are completely separate and you can max out both simultaneously.
Edited by j0hn83 (Sat 16-Jun-18 14:15:11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
Post deleted by ferretuk
|
|
|
TCP Acks
Delays in acks would reduce throughput if the round-trip delay is longer than the TCP window size. Modern TCP stacks tend to use a large window size; you can see with wireshark/tcpdump what window size has been negotiated (including the window scaling factor).
For example, on a test from macOS to TBB speedtest:
| Text | 1
2 | 08:35:01.591036 IP 10.12.255.240.64115 > 80.249.106.133.443: Flags [S], seq 3179489571, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 5,nop,nop,TS val 1257357607 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
08:35:01.602209 IP 80.249.106.133.443 > 10.12.255.240.64115: Flags [S.], seq 863049753, ack 3179489572, win 14480, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 3404316022 ecr 1257357607,nop,wscale 7], length 0 |
Window size in the return direction is 14480 * 2^7 = 1853440 bytes; that translates into about 50ms at 300Mbps. Packet loss can also reduce throughput, because dropped packets reduce the separate congestion window.
If there are multiple TCP streams running concurrently, then each one has its own window. Speedtest.net offers me a larger window (28960 * 2^7); and it also runs six TCP streams concurrently as opposed to TBB's one, to reduce the visible affects of packet loss. In other words, it's tuned to make your ISP look good!
It's also possible that the home router is the bottleneck, as it's doing all that forwarding and NAT.
|
|
|
Hi Mumba,
Congrats on getting to the finish line.
I also have the complete Unifi setup. I originally had the USG gateway, then I got the USG pro. The pro cpu handle's the connection a lot better especially when doing speed tests. Just an FYI.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
|
Its been 26 days now since the survey was actually done by Openreach. But not heard a thing from Cerebrus about the final cost. And to be honest not heard a thing from cerebrus at all.
They were sending me weekly update emails. This stopped on the 24th May and not had an email since.
I sent them an email on the 21st June but that also has not been responded to.
Not sure what is going on.
|
|
|
Its been 26 days now since the survey was actually done by Openreach. But not heard a thing from Cerebrus about the final cost. And to be honest not heard a thing from cerebrus at all.
They were sending me weekly update emails. This stopped on the 24th May and not had an email since.
I sent them an email on the 21st June but that also has not been responded to.
Not sure what is going on.
Why not give Cerberus a call? FWIW I had my build costs confirmed 2-3 days after the Openreach survey by Fluidone but that was in March 2017.
|
|
|
|
Phoned them up just now. it still has not been costed yet by Openreach. And that is 26 days after the survey has been carried out
I really am not looking forward to this final number as it seems like it will be high if OR are taking a month to just tally up the figures.
|
|
|
I had a similar delay, and it doesn't mean the answer will be bad. I think they just have a long work queue at the moment. Openreach have publically declared that they have restricted capacity for FTTPoD.
|
|
|
Candlerb, what were you quoted before and after the survey?
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
I'll post that soon, but I want to make sure it gets to KCI2 first
|
|
|
|
Update 29 June:
Hi All,
I thought I would give a final update now that my line has settled in.
My line seems very stable and I am experiencing download speeds of 38MB/sec on Steam which is a great real world test case for raw through put.
So that means my line is running at close to 310 mega bits per second.
My upload speeds are around 31 mega bits per second which is faster than my previous download speeds.
I still have the issue of my download speeds being dramatically reduced to around 120 mb/s when uploading a large file at the same time. I haven't worked out yet if this is normal (as a result of tcp acks) or a constraint caused by my router which is a Unifi USG.
Latency seems to be really good.
In summary I am very pleased with my line and it's use in the real world.
|
|
|
I still have the issue of my download speeds being dramatically reduced to around 120 mb/s when uploading a large file at the same time. I haven't worked out yet if this is normal (as a result of tcp acks) or a constraint caused by my router which is a Unifi USG.
I don't think its an "issue" at all as I also get reduced download speeds when uploading a large file simultaneously.
Normal download speed
https://s22.postimg.cc/aoczf8rj5/speedtest1.jpg
Download speed with a large upload in the background
https://s22.postimg.cc/gpaocblv5/speedtest2.jpg
|
|
|
|
thanks Baby_frogmella
How come your upload speeds are so good? Did you convert to normal fttp?
Also your ping times are really high at 20ms. I get 4ms.
Anyway it seems normal then that my download speeds reduce so much. It's interesting that yours don't reduce as much in % terms.
|
|
|
How come your upload speeds are so good? Did you convert to normal fttp?
Nope, still on 330/30 FTTPoD. Probably a glitch on speedtest.net. A more realistic speedtest:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/7432609263
Also your ping times are really high at 20ms. I get 4ms.
I'm guessing you live in/near London? Unless I can change the laws of Physics, I'm never going to get 4ms on FTTP living in North Scotland  . Contrary to popular opinion, being on FTTP doesn't always give you single digit ping times - ping times largely depend on your geographical location. Btw I was getting ~ 22ms on FTTC.
Edited by deleted (Fri 29-Jun-18 16:31:13)
|
|
|
I'm guessing you live in/near London? Unless I can change the laws of Physics, I'm never going to get 4ms on FTTP living in North Scotland  . Contrary to popular opinion, being on FTTP doesn't always give you single digit ping times - ping times largely depend on your geographical location. Btw I was getting ~ 22ms on FTTC.
Yeah I am in London. You should move to London to improve your pings.
|
|
|
|
I thought I'd post my Cerberus FTTPod order as it's under the new pricing, I got quotes from both the old pricing version and new desktop survey pricing (with a site survey in process).
Under the old pricing structure I was quoted under the C band which was £2,750.
New pricing structure I was quoted on the desktop survey was £5,600, quite often the initial high estimates from the desktop survey are a result of not having an up to date topography of the network layout.
I've had the first initial site survey yesterday which was all good up until the house where the ducting is a private one and not on their system, they need to come back and do a rod test to see if it does come out at the street duct.
The aggregation node is around 650m away.
As we run a business from home we're looking at hopefully applying for the gigabit voucher scheme to help cover some of the costs.
|
|
|
|
Would you like to start a new thread for FTTPoD desktop quotes vs final prices? This one's getting very long, and the other one this size got locked recently.
|
|
|
I've just had my Survey done today. The Agg node is closer than I thought, approx 200m. There is underground ducting all the way to a Telegraph pole outside the property, the OR Tech did not check for blocked ducts, he said that makes no difference to the price and OR would have to pay to unblock any. He said there would be a new "Fibre cabinet" which would be in one of the existing underground chambers and the job should be straightforward.
Just got to wait for the final quote now but sounds like it should be around the guesstimate of £3900. Hopefully I will be setup before too long
|
|
|
I've just had my Survey done today. The Agg node is closer than I thought, approx 200m. There is underground ducting all the way to a Telegraph pole outside the property, the OR Tech did not check for blocked ducts, he said that makes no difference to the price and OR would have to pay to unblock any. He said there would be a new "Fibre cabinet" which would be in one of the existing underground chambers and the job should be straightforward.
Just got to wait for the final quote now but sounds like it should be around the guesstimate of £3900. Hopefully I will be setup before too long 
That's good to hear.
I got a quote - was told if I had FTTP I would deny 2 premises nearby to get it therefore I would have to pay OR for that privilege.
No one around here could afford it and they could buy a lot of their drugs for that money.
Anyway - £36,000+VAT - so my only hope of getting 1Gbps down would be a few cable lines or something from VM business - luckily they say there is no longer a wayleave problem so I can have as many as I want - the problem there being I am sure 3-4 lines would mess themselves up!
Anyway - FTTP is not for me, not here and not now :/
|
|
|
|
Will be very interested to hear what your final quote is then, as I know from recent installs to other parts of my road that 1x 300m 4-port CBT will get from the footway chamber outside my door containing my copper DP, to the local splitter node. All underground ducted, no poles at all in my case.
I would hope yours is significantly less than £3,900....
|
|
|
I've just had my Survey done today. The Agg node is closer than I thought, approx 200m. There is underground ducting all the way to a Telegraph pole outside the property, the OR Tech did not check for blocked ducts, he said that makes no difference to the price and OR would have to pay to unblock any. He said there would be a new "Fibre cabinet" which would be in one of the existing underground chambers and the job should be straightforward.
Just got to wait for the final quote now but sounds like it should be around the guesstimate of £3900. Hopefully I will be setup before too long 
Just got my final quote - £2455.15. Let me think about it for a while, YES
|
|
|
|
Thought I'd share my update here too! We ordered on 3 October 2018 and have had confirmation today that the works are all done and we are just waiting for a commissioning date to get the service live.
Much to my surprise, based on the other posters that appear to be in urban areas, here in the sticks in Devon our checker is showing WBC FTTP 1000/220 as available which will be a nice uplift in 3 years time when our contract ends.
We don't even have the physical cable installed from the pole yet which must mean the checker changes when the infrastructure is in place.
|
|
|
|
My hope is with G.fast now around me Virgin will up their game to win then back - when they do we all win.
Looks like 1Gbps via wireless is on the cards for us at a new location. I still can't believe out old house was so expensive - i'm glad we've sold it and moved on now!
|
|
|
For what it's worth, while Cerberus has commented elsewhere in the thread stating there's no 750GB limit (strictly speaking I suspect that is true), I've had a phone call from them today telling me that my usage (not sure if they mean total or download only) needs to go sub-1TB by next month or they will be kicking me off the service. My average usage for the last 11 months has been 3.8TB down, 0.5TB up. I'm on the 330/50 FTTP (not FTTPoD) service.
My 12 month contract literally ended just a week ago, suspect that timing is not a coincidence.
Edited by deleted (Wed 31-Oct-18 16:26:23)
|
|
|
I am very surprised to be honest, I have not had a single phone call from them, but I don't think I am hitting much past 1.5TB a month if that....
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
For what it's worth, while Cerberus has commented elsewhere in the thread stating there's no 750GB limit (strictly speaking I suspect that is true), I've had a phone call from them today telling me that my usage (not sure if they mean total or download only) needs to go sub-1TB by next month or they will be kicking me off the service. My average usage for the last 11 months has been 3.8TB down, 0.5TB up. I'm on the 330/50 FTTP (not FTTPoD) service.
My 12 month contract literally ended just a week ago, suspect that timing is not a coincidence.
That's kinda weird. Business usage or something?
|
|
|
I am very surprised to be honest, I have not had a single phone call from them, but I don't think I am hitting much past 1.5TB a month if that....
This is also the first phone call I've received from them as well. If it wasn't clear, my usage has been 3.8TB/0.5TB per month, not in total over 11 months. He was very cagey on giving me an actual number to drop the traffic to but eventually when pushed said than if November was >1TB then they would be asking me to migrate away at the end of the month.
He actually told me they'd received something from BT Wholesale saying that I was affecting the service of other customers. I suspect that was said just to try and shift blame to BT, I don't believe for one second that 4TB of usage per month is affecting other users, I can believe it's really squeezing their profit margin on the product though.
|
|
|
For what it's worth, while Cerberus has commented elsewhere in the thread stating there's no 750GB limit (strictly speaking I suspect that is true), I've had a phone call from them today telling me that my usage (not sure if they mean total or download only) needs to go sub-1TB by next month or they will be kicking me off the service. My average usage for the last 11 months has been 3.8TB down, 0.5TB up. I'm on the 330/50 FTTP (not FTTPoD) service.
My 12 month contract literally ended just a week ago, suspect that timing is not a coincidence.
That's kinda weird. Business usage or something?
Yes the line is used all the time for business and both my wife and I work from home and use it extensively. It was the FTTP Pro package (ie. the one above the one called Business).
|
|
|
That sounds a bit bad, to receive a call about the usage that is. I'm going via them at the moment (order in progress) for FTTPoD, but after the first year I'll most likely return to AAISP as I know what usage limits I have each month rather than 'unlimited with AUP'. Not to mention I'm also being charged extra for a /29 block of IPv4 addresses where with my current ISP (AAISP) it's not an extra charge.
Edited by Ixel (Wed 31-Oct-18 16:58:08)
|
|
|
Well I am guessing, if they do terminate you, you can move to which ever ISP you want? Zen, BT, AAISP etc...
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
Well I am guessing, if they do terminate you, you can move to which ever ISP you want? Zen, BT, AAISP etc...
I'm probably going to proactively move to IDNet. I really like the 50mbps upload and I can't get this on BT Business.
Edited by deleted (Wed 31-Oct-18 17:35:46)
|
|
|
|
Indeed, it's the first time I've ever received a call from an ISP saying that my usage was outside of their AUP. I guess this is the warning for excessive usage they mention in the AUP. As you say though, I much prefer a black and white AUP, and not these "excessive use" statements which don't really tell you anything at all. I just thought I'd post about it since Snake mentioned he was expecting 4TB a month, which is apparently too much! Saying I need to be under 1TB for an "unlimited" plan and the speeds involved here seems really pretty low to me (notwithstanding the fact that they did let me do it for a year at least anyway).
|
|
|
I know you've already gone ahead with Cerberus but being an existing AAISP customer did you also get AAISP to quote you for FTTPoD? The service isn't advertised on their website (probably to deter tyre kickers) but they will quote you for FTTPoD upon request as per Adrian K's blog post earlier this year. Though I imagine they would have monthly data usage limits.
Edited by deleted (Wed 31-Oct-18 20:41:32)
|
|
|
They initially did the new FTTPoD but I didn't order in time before they once again stopped doing it. Pretty sure I read somewhere later on (possibly the blog) that they stopped processing FTTPoD orders. If they had continued processing orders for FTTPoD then they would've been the first ISP for me to try FTTPoD via.
Edited by Ixel (Wed 31-Oct-18 20:59:33)
|
|
|
|
They also currently limit any FTTP/G.Fast to 160Mb (I believe, or there about).
They have published nothing about FTTPod pricing either.
"Call sales and we'll try sell you something else as we don't think that product is any good" is basically what Adrians blog says.
I'd also get FTTPoD from Cerberus on the cheap, then switch back to AA under those circumstances.
|
|
|
I actually made the number up as worst case scenario. With Zen I could check what the max was it was around 750GB, when I started setting my VMWARE lab and was downloading ISO and stuff none stop. So I assumed with the 3 little ones on youtube/netflix plus the Mrs, 4TB a month would be safe.
I honestly don't expect my usage to be that much a month every month. For two people to be using that much data a month is AMAZING, I mean I work in IT, and I doubt many people have a setup like mine, but even then I wouldn't touch that amount constantly.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
Yeah, I am waiting for the upgrades to come out and will jump to 500/165 or 1GB/220 upload. I need the upload more than the download, helps with transferring files to California where our head office is.
Cerberus FTTPoD
|
|
|
He actually told me they'd received something from BT Wholesale saying that I was affecting the service of other customers. I suspect that was said just to try and shift blame to BT, I don't believe for one second that 4TB of usage per month is affecting other users, I can believe it's really squeezing their profit margin on the product though.
Depending on the time of day of the bulk of your usage I can imagine it doing both. I'm sure my ISP are grateful that my work from home alongside the other residential usage doesn't come close to that
Their costs per megabit per second are painful. If the 95th percentile of your usage is in the high double figures at peak times you'll be costing them a small fortune for sure.
|
|
|
Their costs per megabit per second are painful.
I don't think so. In a data centre you can buy transit for 20p per Mbps - I recently bought an unlimited 1Gbps port for £200 per month. If you're buying 10Gbps+ it might be cheaper.
If a user was caning 300Mbps solid *during their peak hours* but only paying £60 per month for the service, that would be a problem.
But 1TB/month works out at 3Mbps average. If you can do most of your bulk transfers overnight they won't bat an eyelid.
|
|
|
Exactly this, I can believe it's costing them something but I absolutely don't believe BTw said anything to them, for a few reasons:
- Most of this usage was out of peak hours.
- If I was really contending the service of other customers I'd expect to see my own speeds drop as well - this never happened.
- Even BT Consumer offer this product with a minimum speed guarantee of 100mbps down at all times including peak, with no traffic limit. Doing that all month would be 32TB+.
Instead I suspect I just don't make enough profit for them, or perhaps they want to squeeze more customers onto their gateways and I would actually start to contend with them - but I really don't believe BTw told them there was any problem, just an easy scapegoat because I can't technically disprove it.
Anyway I didn't really make the reply to debate why it happened, just to point out that the AUP kicks in somewhere between 1TB and 4TB per month since otherwise it's very vague.
EDIT: Also just my opinion, wouldn't be surprised if they can't keep up with their own growth given the price drops in the last 12 months. For the product I have, you can now get it for £54/month for the first 3 months and then £75/month thereafter, cheaper if you take it on 24 month and not 12. I'm paying £114/month for my service, to put into context how much it's dropped. Probably easier to just kick off higher usage customers to maintain the lower prices.
Edited by deleted (Thu 01-Nov-18 08:55:16)
|
|
|
|
Same, need those XG-PON upgrades and an ISP willing to offer it!
|
|
|
Hi Pet0r,
Cerberus does not have a usage policy of 750GB (or any other figure) per month. The usage policy allows us to manage the traffic on our network so that all users maintain a good service at all times. Where an individual users traffic is consistently at a level where we are unable to guarantee this, we discuss their internet usage to ensure that the service they are using is the right one for their needs. Additionally, speculation regarding bandwidth and pricing in the the thread is incorrect and not a determining factor.
Having spoken to my colleagues in the office, there has been a misunderstanding following the call with you. As a public web forum is not the right place for us to discuss your own usage or contract terms, a further call will be helpful here. Please call us at a convenient time between 9-5:30 and we will be happy to help.
Thank you
Cerberus Networks
Edited by deleted (Thu 01-Nov-18 09:34:21)
|
|
|
|
Just called and support rep had no idea what I was talking about and said he will call me back soon.
|
|
|
|
Doesn't sound good. Sounds like British Gas haha, one department or team doesn't know what another department or team are doing.
|